ArticlePLoS computational biology2007
Elucidating the altered transcriptional programs in breast cancer using independent component analysis.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of naturally-occurring canine tumors in translating conserved consequences of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity to human cancers.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- iModulonMiner and PyModulon: Software for unsupervised mining of gene expression compendia.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A primer on correlation-based dimension reduction methods for multi-omics analysis.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Review
- Variational autoencoders learn transferrable representations of metabolomics data.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition-Inducing Factors Involved in the Progression of Lung Cancers.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2022Review
- Metabolomics analysis of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in World Trade Center responders.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Optimal dimensionality selection for independent component analysis of transcriptomic data.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- DNA Methylation Signatures Reveal the Diversity of Processes Remodeling Hepatocellular Carcinoma Methylomes.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2021Article
- Independent component analysis based gene co-expression network inference (ICAnet) to decipher functional modules for better single-cell clustering and batch integration.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Dual Inhibition of MEK and AXL Targets Tumor Cell Heterogeneity and Prevents Resistant Outgrowth Mediated by the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in NSCLC.Cancer research · 2021Article
- Independent component analysis recovers consistent regulatory signals from disparate datasets.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Meta-Analysis of Esophageal Cancer Transcriptomes Using Independent Component Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Machine Learning Uncovers a Data-Driven Transcriptional Regulatory Network for the Crenarchaeal ThermoacidophileFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Application of Transcriptional Gene Modules to Analysis ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- The Escherichia coli transcriptome mostly consists of independently regulated modules.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Dissection of gene expression datasets into clinically relevant interaction signatures via high-dimensional correlation maximization.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Refining diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subgroups using integrated analysis of molecular profiles.EBioMedicine · 2019Article
- Deconvolution of transcriptomes and miRNomes by independent component analysis provides insights into biological processes and clinical outcomes of melanoma patients.BMC medical genomics · 2019Article
- Independent Component Analysis for Unraveling the Complexity of Cancer Omics Datasets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Endocrine Resistance in Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer-From Mechanism to Therapy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quantity of mRNA transcripts in a cell is determined by a complex interplay of cooperative and counteracting biological processes. Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is one of a few number of unsupervised algorithms that have been applied to microarray gene expression data in an attempt to understand phenotype differences in terms of changes in the activation/inhibition patterns of biological pathways. While the ICA model has been shown to outperform other linear representations of the data such as Principal Components Analysis (PCA), a validation using explicit pathway and regulatory element information has not yet been performed. We apply a range of popular ICA algorithms to six of the largest microarray cancer datasets and use pathway-knowledge and regulatory-element databases for validation. We show that ICA outperforms PCA and clustering-based methods in that ICA components map closer to known cancer-related pathways, regulatory modules, and cancer phenotypes. Furthermore, we identify cancer signalling and oncogenic pathways and regulatory modules that play a prominent role in breast cancer and relate the differential activation patterns of these to breast cancer phenotypes. Importantly, we find novel associations linking immune response and epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathways with estrogen receptor status and histological grade, respectively. In addition, we find associations linking the activity levels of biological pathways and transcription factors (NF1 and NFAT) with clinical outcome in breast cancer. ICA provides a framework for a more biologically relevant interpretation of genomewide transcriptomic data. Adopting ICA as the analysis tool of choice will help understand the phenotype-pathway relationship and thus help elucidate the molecular taxonomy of heterogeneous cancers and of other complex genetic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.