Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17707494›Full record

ArticlePharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2007

Higher locomotor response to cocaine in female (vs. male) rats selectively bred for high (HiS) and low (LoS) saccharin intake.

Marilyn E Carroll, Marissa M Anderson, Andrew D Morgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Sex differences in animal models of psychiatric disorders.British journal of pharmacology · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marilyn E CarrollDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, MMC 392, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States. mcarroll@umn.edu
Marissa M Anderson
Andrew D Morgan

Funding

Training in PharmacoNeuroImmune Substance Abuse ResearchT32DA007097 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MOLITOR, THOMAS WILLIAM · 1985 to 2021
$13.1M
Vulnerability to Drug Abuse: Experimental InterventionsR01DA003240 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 1985 to 2010
$3.1M
Models for the Prevention and Treatment of Drug AbuseK05DA015267 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 2002 to 2011
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA015267NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA015267-06NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003240NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003240-23NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007097NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007097-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rats selectively bred for high saccharin consumption (HiS) self-administer more oral ethanol and i.v. cocaine than those selectively bred for low saccharin consumption (LoS). Male and female drug-seeking-prone (HiS) and -resistant (LoS) rats were used in the present experiment to test the prediction that cocaine-induced locomotor activity and sensitization varied with sex and their selective breeding status (HiS and LoS). All rats were intermittently exposed over 2 weeks to pairs of sequential saline and cocaine injections, separated by 45 min. The first 5 pairs of injections, each separated by 2-3 days (10-12 days total), were given to examine the development of cocaine-induced locomotor activity and the development of locomotor sensitization, which was determined by comparing the effects of cocaine injection 1 with injection 6 (given 2 weeks after the 5 pairs of intermittent injections). Results indicated that after the first injection pair (saline, cocaine) the HiS and LoS groups did not differ (saline vs. cocaine) in locomotor activity; however, after cocaine injection pairs 1, 5, and 6, HiS females were more active than HiS males and LoS females. There were also significant phenotype differences (HiS>LoS) in locomotor activity after cocaine injections 5 and 6. There was a weak sensitization effect in cocaine-induced locomotor activity in HiS females after cocaine injection 5 (compared to 1); however it was not present after injection 6 or in other groups. The lack of a strong sensitization effect under these temporal and dose conditions was inconsistent with previous reports. However, the results showing HiS>LoS and females>males on cocaine-induced activity measures are consistent with several measures of cocaine-seeking behavior (acquisition, maintenance, escalation, extinction, and reinstatement), and they suggest that cocaine-induced locomotor activity and sensitization are behavioral markers of drug-seeking phenotypes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCocaineData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleFood PreferencesInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMotor ActivityRatsSaccharinSex CharacteristicsSweetening AgentsTasteCocaineSaccharinSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID17707494
PMCPMC3651992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.