Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17707400›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2007

Evaluating and learning from RNA pseudotorsional space: quantitative validation of a reduced representation for RNA structure.

Leven M Wadley, Kevin S Keating, Carlos M Duarte, Anna Marie Pyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. On the Completeness of Existing RNA Fragment Structures.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  4. gRNAde: Geometric Deep Learning for 3D RNA inverse design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Has AlphaFold3 achieved success for RNA?Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025
    Article
  6. gRNAde: A Geometric Deep Learning Pipeline for 3D RNA Inverse Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The pseudotorsional space of RNA.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Long-Distance Movement ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leven M WadleyDepartment of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Kevin S KeatingInterdepartmental Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Carlos M DuarteDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Anna Marie PyleDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, 266 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University, 266 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. Electronic address: anna.pyle@yale.edu.

Funding

MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH TRAINING AT YALET15LM007056 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Bender Gerstein, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 1987 to 2026
$22.2M
STUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF GROUP II INTRONSR01GM050313 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PYLE, ANNA MARIE · 1994 to 2016
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050313NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM50313NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007056NLM NIH HHS T15 LM07056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitatively describing RNA structure and conformational elements remains a formidable problem. Seven standard torsion angles and the sugar pucker are necessary to characterize the conformation of an RNA nucleotide completely. Progress has been made toward understanding the discrete nature of RNA structure, but classifying simple and ubiquitous structural elements such as helices and motifs remains a difficult task. One approach for describing RNA structure in a simple, mathematically consistent, and computationally accessible manner involves the invocation of two pseudotorsions, eta (C4'(n-1), P(n), C4'(n), P(n+1)) and theta (P(n), C4'(n), P(n+1), C4'(n+1)), which can be used to describe RNA conformation in much the same way that varphi and psi are used to describe backbone configuration of proteins. Here, we conduct an exploration and statistical evaluation of pseudotorsional space and of the Ramachandran-like eta-theta plot. We show that, through the rigorous quantitative analysis of the eta-theta plot, the pseudotorsional descriptors eta and theta, together with sugar pucker, are sufficient to describe RNA backbone conformation fully in most cases. These descriptors are also shown to contain considerable information about nucleotide base conformation, revealing a previously uncharacterized interplay between backbone and base orientation. A window function analysis is used to discern statistically relevant regions of density in the eta-theta scatter plot and then nucleotides in colocalized clusters in the eta-theta plane are shown to have similar 3-D structures through RMSD analysis of the RNA structural constituents. We find that major clusters in the eta-theta plot are few, underscoring the discrete nature of RNA backbone conformation. Like the Ramachandran plot, the eta-theta plot is a valuable system for conceptualizing biomolecular conformation, it is a useful tool for analyzing RNA tertiary structures, and it is a vital component of new approaches for solving the 3-D structures of large RNA molecules and RNA assemblies.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationCluster AnalysisMolecular StructureReproducibility of ResultsRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID17707400
PMCPMC2720064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.