ArticleJournal of molecular biology2007
Evaluating and learning from RNA pseudotorsional space: quantitative validation of a reduced representation for RNA structure.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building RNA coarse-grained force fields: Design principles and training strategies.Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- Structural analysis of uridine modifications in solved RNA structures.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- On the Completeness of Existing RNA Fragment Structures.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- gRNAde: Geometric Deep Learning for 3D RNA inverse design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Has AlphaFold3 achieved success for RNA?Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025Article
- gRNAde: A Geometric Deep Learning Pipeline for 3D RNA Inverse Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- RNA-TorsionBERT: leveraging language models for RNA 3D torsion angles prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- RNAtango: Analysing and comparing RNA 3D structures via torsional angles.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- The pseudotorsional space of RNA.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Long-Distance Movement ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Goldilocks and RNA: where Mg2+ concentration is just right.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- AMIGOS III: pseudo-torsion angle visualization and motif-based structure comparison of nucleic acids.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Developing Community Resources for Nucleic Acid Structures.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- RNANet: an automatically built dual-source dataset integrating homologous sequences and RNA structures.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Coarse-Grained Models of RNA Nanotubes for Large Time Scale Studies in Biomedical Applications.Biomedicines · 2020Article
- Conserved Pseudoknots in lncRNA MEG3 Are Essential for Stimulation of the p53 Pathway.Molecular cell · 2019Article
- A nucleobase-centered coarse-grained representation for structure prediction of RNA motifs.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- R3D-BLAST2: an improved search tool for similar RNA 3D substructures.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Optimization of RNA 3D structure prediction using evolutionary restraints of nucleotide-nucleotide interactions from direct coupling analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Identification of a GUAAY Pentaloop Sequence Involved in a Novel RNA Loop-Helix Interaction.Journal of molecular biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitatively describing RNA structure and conformational elements remains a formidable problem. Seven standard torsion angles and the sugar pucker are necessary to characterize the conformation of an RNA nucleotide completely. Progress has been made toward understanding the discrete nature of RNA structure, but classifying simple and ubiquitous structural elements such as helices and motifs remains a difficult task. One approach for describing RNA structure in a simple, mathematically consistent, and computationally accessible manner involves the invocation of two pseudotorsions, eta (C4'(n-1), P(n), C4'(n), P(n+1)) and theta (P(n), C4'(n), P(n+1), C4'(n+1)), which can be used to describe RNA conformation in much the same way that varphi and psi are used to describe backbone configuration of proteins. Here, we conduct an exploration and statistical evaluation of pseudotorsional space and of the Ramachandran-like eta-theta plot. We show that, through the rigorous quantitative analysis of the eta-theta plot, the pseudotorsional descriptors eta and theta, together with sugar pucker, are sufficient to describe RNA backbone conformation fully in most cases. These descriptors are also shown to contain considerable information about nucleotide base conformation, revealing a previously uncharacterized interplay between backbone and base orientation. A window function analysis is used to discern statistically relevant regions of density in the eta-theta scatter plot and then nucleotides in colocalized clusters in the eta-theta plane are shown to have similar 3-D structures through RMSD analysis of the RNA structural constituents. We find that major clusters in the eta-theta plot are few, underscoring the discrete nature of RNA backbone conformation. Like the Ramachandran plot, the eta-theta plot is a valuable system for conceptualizing biomolecular conformation, it is a useful tool for analyzing RNA tertiary structures, and it is a vital component of new approaches for solving the 3-D structures of large RNA molecules and RNA assemblies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.