The UNLOAD trial: a "nephrologic" standpoint.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cardiorenal rescue study in acute decompensated heart failure: rationale and design of CARRESS-HF, for the Heart Failure Clinical Research Network.Journal of cardiac failure · 2012
   Trial
2. A Pragmatic Approach to Acute Cardiorenal Syndrome: Diagnostic Strategies and Targeted Therapies to Overcome Diuretic Resistance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
   Review
3. Cardiorenal Syndrome and Heart Failure-Challenges and Opportunities.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2019
   Review
4. Ultrafiltration for heart failure: assessment of intravascular volume status through ECG modifications.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2008
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Ultrafiltration versus intravenous diuretics for patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure.2007

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as