ReviewReproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)
An evaluation of evidence for the carcinogenic activity of bisphenol A.
Review in Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed.
- The assumption of a threshold is false in risk assessments for endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) when endogenous hormones being disrupted are already above any possible threshold: a policy failure by the US FDA.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2026Review
- Endocrine-disrupting chemicals as prostate carcinogens.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Exploring the intricate relationship between miRNA dysregulation and breast cancer development: insights into the impact of environmental chemicals.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Comparative analysis of the bioaccumulation of bisphenol A in the blood serum and follicular fluid of women living in two areas with different environmental impacts.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Temporal trends in urinary concentrations of phenols, phthalate metabolites and phthalate replacements between 2000 and 2017 in Boston, MA.The Science of the total environment · 2023Article
- Screening bisphenols in complex samples via a planar Arxula adeninivorans bioluminescence bioassay.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- To Waste or Not to Waste: Questioning Potential Health Risks of Micro- and Nanoplastics with a Focus on Their Ingestion and Potential Carcinogenicity.Exposure and health · 2023Review
- Products of Bisphenol A Degradation Induce Cytotoxicity in Human Erythrocytes (In Vitro).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Bisphenol A: Potential Factor of Miscarriage in Women in the Context of the Phenomenon of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps.Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2022Article
- Can Muscle Building Supplements Increase Testicular Cancer Risk?Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Bisphenol-A exposure and risk of breast and prostate cancer in the Spanish European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2021Article
- Biotechnology-based microbial degradation of plastic additives.3 Biotech · 2021Review
- Update on the Health Effects of Bisphenol A: Overwhelming Evidence of Harm.Endocrinology · 2021Review
- Effects of a Plastic-Free Lifestyle on Urinary Bisphenol A Levels in School-Aged Children of Southern Italy: A Pilot Study.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Environmental chemicals, breast cancer progression and drug resistance.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2020Review
- Endocrine disruptors from the environment affecting breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2020Review
- The impacts of intrauterine Bisphenol A exposure on pregnancy and expression of miRNAs related to heart development and diseases in animal model.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Carbene-based Difluoromethylation of Bisphenols: Application to the Instantaneous Tagging of Bisphenol A in Spiked Soil for Its Detection and Identification by Electron Ionization Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Article
- Bisphenol A co-exposure effects: a key factor in understanding BPA's complex mechanism and health outcomes.Critical reviews in toxicology · 2019Review
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIEHS, NIDCR) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency convened an expert panel of scientists with experience in the field of environmental endocrine disruptors, particularly with knowledge and research on bisphenol A (BPA). Five subpanels were charged to review the published literature and previous reports in five specific areas and to compile a consensus report with recommendations. These were presented and discussed at an open forum entitled "Bisphenol A: An Expert Panel Examination of the Relevance of Ecological, In Vitro and Laboratory Animal Studies for Assessing Risks to Human Health" in Chapel Hill, NC on 28-30 November 2006. The present review consists of the consensus report on the evidence for a role of BPA in carcinogenesis, examining the available evidence in humans and animal models with recommendations for future areas of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.