ArticleBMC health services research2007
Patient, informal caregiver and care provider acceptance of a hospital in the home program in Ontario, Canada.
Article in BMC health services research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Factors influencing the implementation of early discharge hospital at home and admission avoidance hospital at home: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Indicators of home-based hospitalization model and strategies for its implementation: a systematic review of reviews.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Hospital at Home for Early Home Transfer after Bariatric Surgery: A Propensity-Score Matched Study.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Stakeholders' perspectives on the necessary requirements of implementing the Hospital-at-Home program: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Advancing a virtual home hospital: a blueprint for development and expansion.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Barriers to hospital-at-home acceptance: a systematic review of reasons for patient refusal.mHealth · 2024Review
- Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners in Primary Care Plus: A Systematic Review.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- Asian Attitudes and Perceptions Toward Hospital-At-Home: A Cross-Sectional Study.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Cannula complications using elastomeric infusers in Hospital in the Home.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2020Article
- Evaluation of health care providers' role transition and satisfaction in hospital-at-home for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: a survey study.BMC health services research · 2013Article
- Home health care: healing where the heart is.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital in the home programs have been implemented in several countries and have been shown to be safe substitutions (alternatives) to in-patient hospitalization. These programs may offer a solution to the increasing demands made on tertiary care facilities and to surge capacity. We investigated the acceptance of this type of care provision with nurse practitioners as the designated principal home care providers in a family medicine program in a large Canadian urban setting.
methodsPatients requiring hospitalization to the family medicine service ward, for any diagnosis, who met selection criteria, were invited to enter the hospital in the home program as an alternative to admission. Participants in the hospital in the home program, their caregivers, and the physicians responsible for their care were surveyed about their perceptions of the program. Nurse practitioners, who provided care, were surveyed and interviewed.
resultsTen percent (104) of admissions to the ward were screened, and 37 patients participated in 44 home hospital admissions. Twenty nine patient, 17 caregiver and 38 provider surveys were completed. Most patients (88%-100%) and caregivers (92%-100%) reported high satisfaction levels with various aspects of health service delivery. However, a significant proportion in both groups stated that they would select to be treated in-hospital should the need arise again. This was usually due to fears about the safety of the program. Physicians (98%-100%) and nurse practitioners also rated the program highly. The program had virtually no negative impact on the physician workload. However nurse practitioners felt that the program did not utilize their full expertise.
conclusionProvision of hospital level care in the home is well received by patients, their caregivers and health care providers. As a new program, investment in patient education about program safety may be necessary to ensure its long term success. A small proportion of hospital admissions were screened for this program. Appropriate dissemination of program information to family physicians should help buy-in and participation. Nurse practitioners' skills may not be optimally utilized in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.