Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17705859›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2007

Multiple domain insertions and losses in the evolution of the Rab prenylation complex.

Rita Rasteiro, Jose B Pereira-Leal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Consequences of domain insertion on sequence-structure divergence in a superfold.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Rab protein evolution and the history of the eukaryotic endomembrane system.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2010
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rita RasteiroInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Apartado 14, P-2781-901 Oeiras, Portugal. rrasteiro@igc.gulbenkian.pt
Jose B Pereira-Leal
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRab proteins are regulators of vesicular trafficking, requiring a lipid modification for proper function, prenylation of C-terminal cysteines. This is catalysed by a complex of a catalytic heterodimer (Rab Geranylgeranyl Transferase - RabGGTase) and an accessory protein (Rab Escort Protein. REP). Components of this complex display domain insertions relative to paralogous proteins. The function of these inserted domains is unclear.

resultsWe profiled the domain architecture of the components of the Rab prenylation complex in evolution. We identified the orthologues of the components of the Rab prenylation machinery in 43 organisms, representing the crown eukaryotic groups. We characterize in detail the domain structure of all these components and the phylogenetic relationships between the individual domains.

conclusionWe found different domain insertions in different taxa, in alpha-subunits of RGGTase and REP. Our results suggest that there were multiple insertions, expansions and contractions in the evolution of this prenylation complex.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularProtein PrenylationAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAlkyl and Aryl TransferasesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsConserved SequenceGene DuplicationHumansProtein Structure, Tertiaryrab GTP-Binding ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAlkyl and Aryl TransferasesRab geranylgeranyltransferaserab GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17705859
PMCPMC1994686
OpenAlexW2154221933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.