ReviewAnnals of botany2007
Genomic screening for artificial selection during domestication and improvement in maize.
Review in Annals of botany, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Achieving High-Density and Stress-Resilient Maize Breeding Via Germplasm Innovation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Pan-NLR gene family analyses decipher evolutionary dynamics, population diversity, and potential disease resistance genes in cucumber.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Yield and combining ability of temperate ex-PVP introgressed and tropical maize under contrasting moisture regimes.PloS one · 2026Article
- Insights into the genomic divergence of maize heterotic groups in China.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025Article
- Impacts of Weather Anomalies and Climate on Plant Disease.Ecology letters · 2025Review
- How social and economic policies have affected the genome of mezcal agaves: The contrasting stories of Bacanora and Espadín.PloS one · 2025Article
- Genetic basis of phenotypic diversity inFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Genetic improvement of important agronomic traits in Chinese wheat breeding over the past 70 years.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Genotyping of DNA pools identifies untapped landraces and genomic regions to develop next-generation varieties.Plant biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Genetic Diversification of Starch Branching Enzymes during Maize Domestication and Improvement.Genes · 2023Article
- Phylogeography of cultivated and wild ophiopogon japonicus based on chloroplast DNA: exploration of the origin and sustainable cultivation.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- The transcription factor bZIP68 negatively regulates cold tolerance in maize.The Plant cell · 2022Article
- Phenotypic and molecular characterization of a set of tropical maize inbred lines from a public breeding program in Brazil.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Genetic Diversity and Selection Signatures in Synthetic-Derived Wheats and Modern Spring Wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Natural variation and domestication selection ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Analyses of open-access multi-omics data sets reveal genetic and expression characteristics of maizeAoB PLANTS · 2021Article
- Population genetics and genome-wide association studies provide insights into the influence of selective breeding on genetic variation in lettuce.The plant genome · 2021Article
- Increased Power and Accuracy of Causal Locus Identification in Time Series Genome-wide Association in Sorghum.Plant physiology · 2020Article
- Current State and Perspectives in Population Genomics of the Common Bean.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial selection results in phenotypic evolution. Maize (Zea mays L. ssp. mays) was domesticated from its wild progenitor teosinte (Zea mays subspecies parviglumis) through a single domestication event in southern Mexico between 6000 and 9000 years ago. This domestication event resulted in the original maize landrace varieties. The landraces provided the genetic material for modern plant breeders to select improved varieties and inbred lines by enhancing traits controlling agricultural productivity and performance. Artificial selection during domestication and crop improvement involved selection of specific alleles at genes controlling key morphological and agronomic traits, resulting in reduced genetic diversity relative to unselected genes. SCOPE: This review is a summary of research on the identification and characterization by population genetics approaches of genes affected by artificial selection in maize.
conclusionsAnalysis of DNA sequence diversity at a large number of genes in a sample of teosintes and maize inbred lines indicated that approx. 2 % of maize genes exhibit evidence of artificial selection. The remaining genes give evidence of a population bottleneck associated with domestication and crop improvement. In a second study to efficiently identify selected genes, the genes with zero sequence diversity in maize inbreds were chosen as potential targets of selection and sequenced in diverse maize landraces and teosintes, resulting in about half of candidate genes exhibiting evidence for artificial selection. Extended gene sequencing demonstrated a low false-positive rate in the approach. The selected genes have functions consistent with agronomic selection for plant growth, nutritional quality and maturity. Large-scale screening for artificial selection allows identification of genes of potential agronomic importance even when gene function and the phenotype of interest are unknown. These approaches should also be applicable to other domesticated species if specific demographic conditions during domestication exist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.