Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17703239›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2007

Integrating physical and genetic maps: from genomes to interaction networks.

Andreas Beyer, Sourav Bandyopadhyay, Trey Ideker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gene regulatory networks in disease and ageing.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Testing the Domino Theory of Gene Loss inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andreas BeyerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
Sourav Bandyopadhyay
Trey Ideker

Funding

A Systems Approach to Mapping the DNA Damage ResponseR01ES014811 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2005 to 2021
$8.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES014811NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical and genetic mapping data have become as important to network biology as they once were to the Human Genome Project. Integrating physical and genetic networks currently faces several challenges: increasing the coverage of each type of network; establishing methods to assemble individual interaction measurements into contiguous pathway models; and annotating these pathways with detailed functional information. A particular challenge involves reconciling the wide variety of interaction types that are currently available. For this purpose, recent studies have sought to classify genetic and physical interactions along several complementary dimensions, such as ordered versus unordered, alleviating versus aggravating, and first versus second degree.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksGenetic TechniquesGenome, HumanPhysical Chromosome MappingHumansModels, BiologicalSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID17703239
PMCPMC2811081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.