ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2007
The development of high-throughput screening approaches for stem cell engineering.
Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogels Containing Gradients in Vascular Density Reveal Dose-Dependent Role of Angiocrine Cues on Stem Cell Behavior.Advanced functional materials · 2021Article
- Application of biomaterials to advance induced pluripotent stem cell research and therapy.The EMBO journal · 2015Review
- Control of cultured human cells with femtosecond laser ablated patterns on steel and plastic surfaces.Biomedical microdevices · 2013Article
- Simplified microenvironments and reduced cell culture size influence the cell differentiation outcome in cellular microarrays.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2013Article
- Microarrayed Materials for Stem Cells.Materials today (Kidlington, England) · 2012Article
- Deeply dissecting stemness: making sense to non-coding RNAs in stem cells.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2012Review
- Multiplexed, high-throughput analysis of 3D microtissue suspensions.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2010Article
- Influence of fabrication parameters in cellular microarrays for stem cell studies.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2009Article
- Combinatorial and rational approaches to polymer synthesis for medicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It has become increasingly clear that both soluble factors, such as growth factors, and insoluble factors, including the surfaces on which cells grow, can have controlling effects on stem cell behavior and differentiation. While much progress has been made in biomaterial design and application, the rational design of biomaterial cues to direct stem cell behavior and differentiation remains challenging. Recent advances in automated, high-throughput methods for synthesizing and screening combinatorial biomaterial libraries and cellular microenvironments promise to accelerate the discovery of factors that control stem cell behavior. Specific examples include miniaturized, automated, combinatorial material synthesis and extracellular matrix screening methods as well microarrayed methods for creating local microenvironments of soluble factors, such as small molecules, siRNA, and other signaling molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.