Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17701138›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2007

[R1 resection in the region of the lower gastrointestinal tract: relevance and therapeutic consequences].

M Hünerbein, P M Schlag

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [R1 resection in rectal cancer].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M HünerbeinKlinik für Chirurgie und Chirurgische Onkologie, Charite Campus Buch im Helios Klinikum, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13122 Berlin, Germany. michael.huenerbein@charite.de
P M Schlag

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incomplete resection (R1) and local recurrence of colorectal cancer continue to be a significant surgical problem. Radical resection of bowel and lymph node bassin are clearly necessary after incomplete endoscopic resection or local surgical excision. However, the situation is more difficult after previous conventional surgery. Anastomotic recurrence following resection and lymph nodal recurrence can often precede curative reresection. Locoregional lymph node metastases due to incomplete surgical clearance of the lymphatic drainage of colonic cancer may also be cured by radical reresection. Despite application of neoadjuvant therapy, integration of modern surgical concepts such as the circumferential resection margin and advances in surgical technique, R1 resection of rectal cancer remains a major problem. Although primary surgical therapy may be considered in selected cases, this situation will require multimodal therapy in most instances.

Indexed as

ColonColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEndoscopyFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualPatient SelectionPreoperative CareRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.