Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17701126›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2007

Diagnosis of intestinal amoebiasis by using nested polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay.

Krishna Khairnar, Subhash Chandra Parija, Ravisankar Palaniappan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Amebic liver abscess: An update.World journal of hepatology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Accurate laboratory diagnosis of human intestinal and extra-intestinal amoebiasis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2022
    Review
  6. Tropical medicine and health · 2020
    Review
  7. Update on laboratory diagnosis of amoebiasis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in clinical samples through PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Amebic Liver Abscess in Israeli Travelers: A Retrospective Study.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular epidemiology of human intestinal amoebas in iran.Iranian journal of public health · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krishna KhairnarDepartment of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry 605006, India.
Subhash Chandra Parija
Ravisankar Palaniappan
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroscopy is unreliable to distinguish the pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica from the nonpathogenic Entamoeba dispar or Entamoeba moshkovskii in stool specimens.

methodsNested polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was carried out to detect E. histolytica, E. dispar, and E. moshkovskii DNA in stool samples of 202 patients positive for E. histolytica, E. dispar, or E. moshkovskii by microscopy or culture and in 35 controls. The TechLab E. histolytica II enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to detect Gal/GalNAc lectin in 45 stool samples positive for E. histolytica, E. dispar, or E. moshkovskii by microscopy or culture. Rapid-indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA) was performed to detect serum antiamoebic antibodies in the 85 patients positive for E. histolytica, E. dispar, or E. moshkovskii in their stool specimens and in the 35 controls.

resultsNested PCR-RFLP was positive in 175 of 202 (86.6%) patient stool samples and was negative in all 35 negative control stool samples. ELISA was positive in 29 of 45 (64.4%) patient stool samples. The IHA test was positive in 19 of 85 (22.4%) patient serum samples and in one (2.8%) of the 35 control serum samples. Nested PCR-RFLP detected E. histolytica DNA in stool specimens of 12 (63.2%) of 19 seropositive patients, and in 31 (47%) of 66 seronegative patients. TechLab E. histolytica II ELISA detected E. histolytica antigen in stool specimens of six (54.5%) of 11 seropositive patients, and in 23 (67.6%) of 34 seronegative patients.

conclusionsNested PCR-RFLP was useful for the specific detection of E. histolytica, E. dispar, and E. moshkovskii in stool samples.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanDiagnosis, DifferentialDNA, ProtozoanEntamoebaEntamoebiasisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesHumansIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, ProtozoanDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID17701126
OpenAlexW2071040185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.