Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17701032›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2007

Persistence with antihypertensive treatments: results of a 3-year follow-up cohort study.

Joerg Hasford, Detlef Schröder-Bernhardi, Marietta Rottenkolber, Karel Kostev, Gerhard Dietlein

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Hypertension and Drug Adherence in the Elderly.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joerg HasfordIBE - Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. has@ibe.med.uni-muenchen.de
Detlef Schröder-Bernhardi
Marietta Rottenkolber
Karel Kostev
Gerhard Dietlein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEffective treatment of hypertension requires continued prescribing of antihypertensive medications for many years. Persistence in prescribing habits, however, has been reported to be low. The study described herein - which is completely independent of pharmaceutical sponsors - was undertaken to evaluate persistence with antihypertensive treatment in Germany.

methodsA total of 13,763 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients were identified in the IMS Disease Analyzer database and observed for 3 years after their first antihypertensive prescription.

resultsThe median age of the study cohort was 65 years, and 56% were female. One in four patient received no more than three prescriptions within 3 years. Persistence was longest for patients whose initial prescription was for a free combination based on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (median: 392.5 days), followed patients initially receiving a fixed combination, including angiotensin II receptor antagonists (208.5 days) and AIIRA monotherapy (168 days). Persistence was shortest with diuretics (57 days). Across all treatment groups, persistence after 3 years was 15.2%. Insurance status, sex and comorbidities were not found to impact persistence.

conclusionOur data indicate that persistence differs markedly among the drug classes (p < or = 0.001) but that even persistence of the best drug class is not sufficient to provide for an adequate blood pressure control in the population. The largest decline in persistence occurred in the first 3 months of treatment. More research is needed to elucidate the causes of this early drop in persistence and to develop effective means of improving the currently unsatisfactory situation.

Indexed as

AgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCohort StudiesComorbidityDatabases, FactualDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansHypertensionInsurance CoverageAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.