Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17701027›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2007

How effective is it to sequentially switch among Olanzapine, Quetiapine and Risperidone?--A randomized, open-label study of algorithm-based antipsychotic treatment to patients with symptomatic schizophrenia in the real-world clinical setting.

Takefumi Suzuki, Hiroyuki Uchida, Koichiro Watanabe, Kensuke Nomura, Hiroyoshi Takeuchi, Masayuki Tomita, Kenichi Tsunoda, Shintaro Nio, Ryoske Den, Hiroshi Manki and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Switching Antipsychotics to Blonanserin in Patients with Schizophrenia: An Open-label, Prospective, Multicenter Study.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Presynaptic Dopamine Capacity in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia Taking Clozapine: An [Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
  9. The SWITCH study: rationale and design of the trial.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Takefumi SuzukiDepartment of Neuro-Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. takefumi@oak.dti.ne.jp
Hiroyuki Uchida
Koichiro Watanabe
Kensuke Nomura
Hiroyoshi Takeuchi
Masayuki Tomita
Kenichi Tsunoda
Shintaro Nio
Ryoske Den
Hiroshi Manki
Akira Tanabe
Gohei Yagi
Haruo Kashima
Keio University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleEvidence on sequential trial with atypical antipsychotics has been scarce.

objectivesWe conducted an algorithm-based antipsychotic pharmacotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this open-label study, patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) were treated with antipsychotic monotherapy, step-by-step, with each trial lasting up to 8 weeks. At baseline, they were highly symptomatic to score more than 54 in the total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS(1-7)) score. When the posttreatment BPRS score was above 70% of the baseline, they were subsequently treated with another and up to three atypicals. Basically, anticholinergics were prohibited, and only adjunctive allowed was lorazepam. The secondary endpoint was a clinical status good enough to be discharged for 66 inpatients and a successful continuation therapy with the same antipsychotic agent for more than 6 months for 12 outpatients.

resultsThree groups of 26 patients each were randomized to Olanzapine, Quetiapine, or Risperidone. Thirty-nine (50%) responded to the first agent (Olanzapine16, Quetiapine9, Risperidone14), and 14 responded to the second. Only two showed response to the third, and 16 failed to respond to all three antipsychotics, with only 7 dropouts. Overall, there were 22 Olanzapine, 14 Quetiapine, and 19 Risperidone responders. Based on the secondary outcome, 20 Olanzapine-treated (average maximum dose, 15.4 mg), 10 Quetiapine-treated (418 mg), and 20 Risperidone-treated (4.10 mg) patients responded. The difference in response as the first choice was significant (p < 0.05). Relative doses of those failing to respond were comparable (Olanzapine 18.3 mg, Quetiapine 564 mg, Risperidone5.47 mg). Extrapyramidal symptoms did not change significantly.

conclusionsWhen the first atypical antipsychotic is inadequate, switching to the second is worth trying, although some remain treatment-refractory. Quetiapine may be inferior to Olanzapine and Risperidone in symptomatic patients.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesDibenzothiazepinesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOlanzapineQuetiapine FumarateRisperidoneSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesDibenzothiazepinesOlanzapineQuetiapine FumarateRisperidone

Identifiers

PMID17701027
OpenAlexW2056463197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.