Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17699977›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2007

Newer diagnostic tests for bacterial diseases.

B D Bhatia, Sriparna Basu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Duplex PCR Assay for Rapid Detection ofFoodborne pathogens and disease · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B D BhatiaDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. baldev_bhatia@rediffmail.com
Sriparna Basu
Banaras Hindu University · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In diagnosing bacterial infections, the rapid identification of bacteremia at an early stage of the disease is critical for a favorable outcome. Furthermore, it is important that exact information be obtained on the stage of the disease rapidly in order to choose and initiate the appropriate therapy. In recent years many new techniques have been added in the diagnostic tools. During the past decade, there has been unprecedented progress in molecular biology as well as in the application of nucleic acid technology to the study of the epidemiology of human infection. Highly sensitive molecular techniques are found to be capable of detecting minute amounts of specific microbial DNA sequences and their complex genetic variations. Moreover, altered levels of biomarkers such as procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor alpha and several interleukins are also found to be promising to define systemic inflammatory response syndrome as indirect evidences of bacterial infections. Lastly, many rapid culture methods are coming up to achieve faster bacterial diagnosis. In this review we will focus on these three newer methods for the early diagnosis of bacterial infections. These approaches will help to expedite the diagnosis of especially early infections and might be a further step towards the improvement of therapeutic methods.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesBacterial InfectionsBiomarkersHumansBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID17699977
OpenAlexW1996667842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.