ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2007
Cranial ultrasound in metabolic disorders presenting in the neonatal period: characteristic features and comparison with MR imaging.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Foetal disruptive brain injuries: Diagnosing the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms with cranial ultrasonography.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Review
- Frontal Paraventricular Cysts: Refined Definitions and Outcomes.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- High-resolution neurosonographic examination of the lenticulostriate vessels in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- The Effects of Prenatal Diagnosis on the Interaction of the Mother-Infant Dyad: A Longitudinal Study of Prenatal Care in the First Year of Life.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Neuromonitoring in Rare Disorders of Metabolism.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2021Review
- Superficial anatomy of the neonatal cerebrum - an ultrasonographic roadmap.Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- Imaging the term neonatal brain.Paediatrics & child health · 2018Review
- Concerns about a New Preterm MR Imaging Scoring System.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018Article
- Cranial Ultrasonography in Infantile Encephalitic Beriberi: A Useful First-Line Imaging Tool for Screening and Diagnosis in Suspected Cases.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2016Article
- Posterior fossa abnormalities in high-risk term infants: comparison of ultrasound and MRI.European radiology · 2015Article
- Neurometabolic diseases of childhood.Pediatric radiology · 2015Review
- Brain ultrasound in Canavan disease.Journal of ultrasound · 2014Article
- Neonatal neuroimaging findings in inborn errors of metabolism.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2013Review
- Patterns of neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury.Neuroradiology · 2010Review
- Inborn errors of metabolism for the diagnostic radiologist.Pediatric radiology · 2009Review
- Neonatal pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency due to a R302H mutation in the PDHA1 gene: MRI findings.Pediatric radiology · 2008Article
- Role of Transcranial Ultrasound and Doppler Studies to Evaluate Intracranial Pathologies in Preterm and High-risk Term Neonates.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeBrain imaging is an integral part of the diagnostic work-up for metabolic disorders, and the bedside availability of cranial ultrasonography (cUS) allows very early brain imaging in symptomatic neonates. Our aim was to investigate the role and range of abnormalities seen on cUS in neonates presenting with metabolic disorders. A secondary aim, when possible, was to address the question of whether brain MR imaging is more informative by comparing cUS to MR imaging findings. MATERIALS AND
methodsNeonates with a metabolic disorder who had at least 1 cUS scan were eligible. cUS images were reviewed for anatomic and maturation features, cysts, calcium, and other abnormalities. When an MR imaging scan had been obtained, both sets of images were compared.
resultsFifty-five infants (35 also had MR imaging) were studied. The most frequent findings were in oxidative phosphorylation disorders (21 cUS and 12 MR imaging): ventricular dilation (11 cUS and 6 MR imaging), germinolytic cysts (GLCs; 7 cUS and 5 MR imaging), and abnormal white matter (7 cUS and 6 MR imaging); in peroxisomal biogenesis disorders (13 cUS and 9 MR imaging): GLCs (10 cUS and 6 MR imaging), ventricular dilation (10 cUS and 5 MR imaging), abnormal cortical folding (8 cUS and 7 MR imaging), and lenticulostriate vasculopathy (8 cUS); in amino acid metabolism and urea cycle disorders (14 cUS and 11 MR imaging): abnormal cortical folding (9 cUS and 4 MR imaging), abnormal white matter (8 cUS and 8 MR imaging), and hypoplasia of the corpus callosum (7 cUS and 6 MR imaging); in organic acid disorders (4 cUS and 2 MR imaging): periventricular white matter echogenicity (2 cUS and 1 MR imaging); and in other disorders (3 cUS and 1 MR imaging): ventricular dilation (2 cUS and 1 MR imaging). cUS findings were consistent with MR imaging findings. cUS was better for visualizing GLCs and calcification. MR imaging was more sensitive for subtle tissue signal intensity changes in the white matter and abnormality in areas difficult to visualize with cUS, though abnormalities of cortical folding suggestive of polymicrogyria were seen on cUS.
conclusionA wide range of abnormalities is seen using cUS in neonatal metabolic disorders. cUS is a reliable bedside tool for early detection of cysts, calcium, structural brain abnormalities, and white matter echogenicity, all suggestive of metabolic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.