Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17698520›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2007

Cranial ultrasound in metabolic disorders presenting in the neonatal period: characteristic features and comparison with MR imaging.

L M Leijser, L S de Vries, M A Rutherford, A Y Manzur, F Groenendaal, T J de Koning, M van der Heide-Jalving, F M Cowan

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Frontal Paraventricular Cysts: Refined Definitions and Outcomes.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuromonitoring in Rare Disorders of Metabolism.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Imaging the term neonatal brain.Paediatrics & child health · 2018
    Review
  8. Concerns about a New Preterm MR Imaging Scoring System.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neurometabolic diseases of childhood.Pediatric radiology · 2015
    Review
  12. Brain ultrasound in Canavan disease.Journal of ultrasound · 2014
    Article
  13. Neonatal neuroimaging findings in inborn errors of metabolism.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2013
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

L M LeijserDepartment of Paediatrics and Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
L S de Vries
M A Rutherford
A Y Manzur
F Groenendaal
T J de Koning
M van der Heide-Jalving
F M Cowan
Philips (Finland) · FIHammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120088465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeBrain imaging is an integral part of the diagnostic work-up for metabolic disorders, and the bedside availability of cranial ultrasonography (cUS) allows very early brain imaging in symptomatic neonates. Our aim was to investigate the role and range of abnormalities seen on cUS in neonates presenting with metabolic disorders. A secondary aim, when possible, was to address the question of whether brain MR imaging is more informative by comparing cUS to MR imaging findings. MATERIALS AND

methodsNeonates with a metabolic disorder who had at least 1 cUS scan were eligible. cUS images were reviewed for anatomic and maturation features, cysts, calcium, and other abnormalities. When an MR imaging scan had been obtained, both sets of images were compared.

resultsFifty-five infants (35 also had MR imaging) were studied. The most frequent findings were in oxidative phosphorylation disorders (21 cUS and 12 MR imaging): ventricular dilation (11 cUS and 6 MR imaging), germinolytic cysts (GLCs; 7 cUS and 5 MR imaging), and abnormal white matter (7 cUS and 6 MR imaging); in peroxisomal biogenesis disorders (13 cUS and 9 MR imaging): GLCs (10 cUS and 6 MR imaging), ventricular dilation (10 cUS and 5 MR imaging), abnormal cortical folding (8 cUS and 7 MR imaging), and lenticulostriate vasculopathy (8 cUS); in amino acid metabolism and urea cycle disorders (14 cUS and 11 MR imaging): abnormal cortical folding (9 cUS and 4 MR imaging), abnormal white matter (8 cUS and 8 MR imaging), and hypoplasia of the corpus callosum (7 cUS and 6 MR imaging); in organic acid disorders (4 cUS and 2 MR imaging): periventricular white matter echogenicity (2 cUS and 1 MR imaging); and in other disorders (3 cUS and 1 MR imaging): ventricular dilation (2 cUS and 1 MR imaging). cUS findings were consistent with MR imaging findings. cUS was better for visualizing GLCs and calcification. MR imaging was more sensitive for subtle tissue signal intensity changes in the white matter and abnormality in areas difficult to visualize with cUS, though abnormalities of cortical folding suggestive of polymicrogyria were seen on cUS.

conclusionA wide range of abnormalities is seen using cUS in neonatal metabolic disorders. cUS is a reliable bedside tool for early detection of cysts, calcium, structural brain abnormalities, and white matter echogenicity, all suggestive of metabolic disorders.

Indexed as

BrainBrain DiseasesEchoencephalographyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMetabolic DiseasesNeonatal ScreeningReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID17698520
PMCPMC7977655
OpenAlexW2159188084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.