Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17697367›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2007

Prospective study of Outcomes in Sporadic versus Hereditary breast cancer (POSH): study protocol.

Diana Eccles, Sue Gerty, Peter Simmonds, Victoria Hammond, Sarah Ennis, Douglas G Altman, POSH steering group

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Polymorphism at 19q13.41 Predicts Breast Cancer Survival Specifically after Endocrine Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Identification of novel genetic markers of breast cancer survival.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Pathogenic Variants inJCO precision oncology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diana EcclesSomers Cancer Sciences Building Mail Point 824, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YA, UK. de1@soton.ac.uk
Sue Gerty
Peter Simmonds
Victoria Hammond
Sarah Ennis
Douglas G Altman
POSH steering group
Southampton General Hospital · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung women presenting with breast cancer are more likely to have a genetic predisposition to the disease than breast cancer patients in general. A genetic predisposition is known to increase the risk of new primary breast (and other) cancers. It is unclear from the literature whether genetic status should be taken into consideration when planning adjuvant treatment in a young woman presenting with a first primary breast cancer. The primary aim of the POSH study is to establish whether genetic status influences the prognosis of primary breast cancer independently of known prognostic factors. METHODS/

designThe study is a prospective cohort study recruiting 3,000 women aged 40 years or younger at breast cancer diagnosis; the recruiting period covers 1st June 2001 to 31st December 2007. Written informed consent is obtained at study entry. Family history and known epidemiological risk data are collected by questionnaire. Clinical information about diagnosis, treatment and clinical course is collected and blood is stored. Follow up data are collected annually after the first year. An additional recruitment category includes women aged 41 to 50 years who are found to be BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene carriers and were diagnosed with their first breast cancer during the study recruiting period. DISCUSSION: Power estimates were based on 10% of the cohort carrying a BRCA1 gene mutation. Preliminary BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation analysis in a pilot set of study participants confirms we should have 97% power to detect a difference of 10% in event rates between gene carriers and sporadic young onset cases. Most of the recruited patients (>80%) receive an anthracycline containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimen making planned analyses more straightforward.

Indexed as

AdultBiological Specimen BanksBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyEnglandFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2HumansMiddle AgedNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryPrognosisProspective StudiesResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID17697367
PMCPMC1995215
OpenAlexW1965156081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.