Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17697354›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2007

Identification of human pathogens isolated from blood using microarray hybridisation and signal pattern recognition.

Herbert Wiesinger-Mayr, Klemens Vierlinger, Rudolf Pichler, Albert Kriegner, Alexander M Hirschl, Elisabeth Presterl, Levente Bodrossy, Christa Noehammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Computational design of probes to detect bacterial genomes by multivalent binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterization of microbial pathogens by DNA microarrays.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2009
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Herbert Wiesinger-MayrMolecular Diagnostics, Austrian Research Centers GmbH - ARC, Mendelstrasse 1, A-2444 Seibersdorf, Austria. herbert.wiesinger@arcs.ac.at
Klemens Vierlinger
Rudolf Pichler
Albert Kriegner
Alexander M Hirschl
Elisabeth Presterl
Levente Bodrossy
Christa Noehammer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathogen identification in clinical routine is based on the cultivation of microbes with subsequent morphological and physiological characterisation lasting at least 24 hours. However, early and accurate identification is a crucial requisite for fast and optimally targeted antimicrobial treatment. Molecular biology based techniques allow fast identification, however discrimination of very closely related species remains still difficult.

resultsA molecular approach is presented for the rapid identification of pathogens combining PCR amplification with microarray detection. The DNA chip comprises oligonucleotide capture probes for 25 different pathogens including Gram positive cocci, the most frequently encountered genera of Enterobacteriaceae, non-fermenter and clinical relevant Candida species. The observed detection limits varied from 10 cells (e.g. E. coli) to 10(5) cells (S. aureus) per mL artificially spiked blood. Thus the current low sensitivity for some species still represents a barrier for clinical application. Successful discrimination of closely related species was achieved by a signal pattern recognition approach based on the k-nearest-neighbour method. A prototype software providing this statistical evaluation was developed, allowing correct identification in 100 % of the cases at the genus and in 96.7 % at the species level (n = 241).

conclusionThe newly developed molecular assay can be carried out within 6 hours in a research laboratory from pathogen isolation to species identification. From our results we conclude that DNA microarrays can be a useful tool for rapid identification of closely related pathogens particularly when the protocols are adapted to the special clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesMycological Typing TechniquesBacteremiaBacteriaBloodCandidaDNA, BacterialFungemiaHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOligonucleotide ProbesPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, BacterialOligonucleotide Probes

Identifiers

PMID17697354
PMCPMC1994958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.