ReviewDrug safety2007
Safety profile of meropenem: an updated review of over 6,000 patients treated with meropenem.
Review in Drug safety, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurological Adverse Effects Attributable to β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Literature Review.Drug safety · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Clinical and microbiological efficacy of continuous versus intermittent application of meropenem in critically ill patients: a randomized open-label controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2012Trial
- Case Report: Delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to meropenem in an elderly patient-successful management with imipenem-cilastatin.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Trends in carbapenem antibiotics utilization, costs, and market dynamics in Medicaid: a retrospective analysis from 1991 to 2023.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Interventions forJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Meropenem/Vaborbactam-A Mechanistic Review for Insight into Future Development of Combinational Therapies.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Clinical Challenge: Standard Versus Extended Meropenem Infusion in Children.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2024Article
- [Clinical practice guidelines for meropenem therapy in neonatal sepsis (2024)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024Article
- Concomitant Administration of Vancomycin with a High Dose of Meropenem May Cause Acute Kidney Injury.Case reports in infectious diseases · 2024Article
- The Impact of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on a Retrospective Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Treated with a Combination of Steroids and Tocilizumab.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Developmental Population Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem in Chinese Neonates and Young Infants: Dosing Recommendations for Late-Onset Sepsis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Real-world Biapenem vs. Meropenem in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia in children: A propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Development of a Model-Informed Dosing Tool to Optimise Initial Antibiotic Dosing-A Translational Example for Intensive Care Units.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Synergistic Antibacterial Effects of Meropenem in Combination with Aminoglycosides against Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Beta-Lactams Toxicity in the Intensive Care Unit: An Underestimated Collateral Damage?Microorganisms · 2021Review
- "Off-Label" Medicine Use In Burned Children: Three-Year Retrospective Study.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2021Article
- Real-World Use of Generic Meropenem: Results of an Observational Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A "Single-Use" Ceramic-Based Electrochemical Sensor Chip Using Molecularly Imprinted Carbon Paste Electrode.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibacterial with potent antimicrobial activity against a broad range of Gram-negative, Gram-positive and anaerobic bacteria. The second parenteral carbapenem to be introduced worldwide, meropenem has been in clinical use since 1994. Two previous safety reviews have established that meropenem has a favourable and acceptable safety profile. This new review was conducted after the approval of meropenem in the US in 2005 for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections, in addition to the previously approved indications of intra-abdominal infections and paediatric bacterial meningitis. The analysis includes the clinical trial data from the previous safety reviews, updated with expanded experience across a number of serious bacterial infections, including a large international study in patients with skin or skin-structure infections and further experience in patients with intra-abdominal infections and bacterial meningitis. A total of 6154 patients with 6308 meropenem exposures were compared with 4483 patients treated with comparator agents (4593 exposures), and the paediatric population base for which safety data are available has doubled to over 1000 patients. The data presented reinforce the favourable safety profile of meropenem. In general, the incidence and pattern of adverse events occurring with meropenem were similar to those of the first carbapenem, imipenem/cilastatin, and to those of the cephalosporin- and clindamycin-based regimens to which it had been compared. The most common adverse events reported for meropenem were diarrhoea (2.5%), rash (1.4%) and nausea/vomiting (1.2%). No adverse event occurred in more than 3% of patient exposures to meropenem, indicating a low overall frequency of adverse events as well as excellent gastrointestinal tolerability. Furthermore, no unexpected adverse events were identified, and the very low incidence of seizures in patients with meningitis was not considered to be drug related. In infections other than meningitis, the incidence of seizures considered by investigators to be related to meropenem treatment was 0.07%. In the new studies that updated the earlier safety data, no new cases of drug-related seizure were reported for any treatment or patient group (meningitis/non-meningitis infections). In conclusion, meropenem is well tolerated and has good CNS and gastrointestinal tolerability when used for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in a wide range of adult and paediatric patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.