Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17694376›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2008

Effect of selective and non-selective beta-blockers on body weight, insulin resistance and leptin concentration in chronic heart failure.

D Kovacić, M Marinsek, L Gobec, M Lainscak, M Podbregar

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Leptin in anorexia and cachexia syndrome.International journal of peptides · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Individuals at risk of beta-blocker discontinuation: a cohort study in 19,177 Chinese patients.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2010
    Article
  11. Insulin resistance and heart failure.Current heart failure reports · 2009
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Heart failure, aging and beta-blockers: the need for more data on tolerability and efficacy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2008
    Article
  14. Beta blockers and glucose metabolism in chronic heart failure: friend or foe?Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D KovacićDepartment of Cardiology, General and Teaching Hospital Celje, Celje, Slovenia.
M Marinsek
L Gobec
M Lainscak
M Podbregar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic heart failure (CHF) is characterized by increased insulin resistance and hyperleptinaemia. We aimed to study effects of selective and non-selective beta-blockers on body weight, insulin resistance, plasma concentrations of leptin and resistin in patients with CHF.

methodsTwenty-six non-cachectic beta-blocker-naive patients with CHF were randomized and treated with either carvedilol or bisoprolol. Body weight, plasma concentrations of leptin, resistin, fasting glucose and insulin were measured at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. Insulin resistance was estimated by homeostasis model assessment- estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).

resultsBody weight increased significantly in the carvedilol group (mean change + 2.30 kg, p = 0.023) while it did not change in the bisoprolol group (mean change -0.30 kg, p = 0.623) (ns between groups). Plasma leptin concentration increased only in the carvedilol group (mean change + 4.20 ng/ml, p = 0.019) (ns between groups). Fasting glucose and resistin remained unchanged in both groups. After 6 months, mean plasma insulin concentration changed significantly differently (p = 0.015) in the bisoprolol (mean change +3.1 microU/ml) compared to the carvedilol group (mean change -6.3 microU/ml) and HOMA-IR was consequently higher in the bisoprolol compared to the carvedilol group (5.2 +/- 4.2 vs 2.8 +/- 1.6, p = 0.046).

conclusionThis study found different metabolic effects of carvedilol and bisoprolol in non-cachectic patients with CHF. With unchanged fasting plasma glucose concentration after 6 months of treatment, carvedilol significantly decreased plasma insulin concentration and insulin resistance compared to bisoprolol.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedBisoprololBlood GlucoseBody WeightCarbazolesCarvedilolChronic DiseaseFemaleHeart FailureHomeostasisHumansInsulinLeptinMaleAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBisoprololBlood GlucoseCarbazolesCarvedilolInsulinLeptinPropanolaminesResistin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.