ArticleInflammopharmacology1998
From the H(2) receptor gene to reclassification of the H(2) receptor antagonists.
Article in Inflammopharmacology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From previous studies it is known that long-term stimulation of the histamine H(2) receptor results in receptor downregulation. Two different pathways are involved in the downregulation process of the H(2) receptor: a cAMP-dependent and cAMP-independent agonist-dependent pathway. Recently, it became evident that in the absence of an agonist the H(2) receptor expressed in CHO cells already stimulate cAMP production, also referred to as spontaneous activity. The spontaneous activity can be inhibited by several H(2) antagonists, previously thought to act as competitive antagonists, and these antagonists are referred to as inverse agonists. Some antagonists, e.g. burimamide, are not able to inhibit the spontaneous activity and are referred to as neutral antagonists. Inverse agonism appears to be the mechanistic basis of upregulation. Only inverse agonists and not neutral antagonists induce receptor upregulation after long-term treatment as these compounds inhibit the spontaneous receptor activity and thus the basal receptor downregulation. Moreover it might also explain previously reported observations after long-term treatment of gastric ulcers, such as intragastric hyperacidity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.