Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17693219›Full record

ArticleApplied nursing research : ANR2007

Sample size considerations when groups are the appropriate unit of analysis.

Georgia Robins Sadler, Celine Marie Ko, Jennifer Alisangco, Bradley P Rosbrook, Eric Miller, Judith Fullerton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied nursing research : ANR, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgia Robins SadlerSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0623, USA. gsadler@ucsd.edu
Celine Marie Ko
Jennifer Alisangco
Bradley P Rosbrook
Eric Miller
Judith Fullerton
University of California, San Diego · USMoores Cancer Center

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DIANE M SIMEONE · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
San Diego EXPORT Comprehensive NCMHD Research CenterP60MD000220 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DALEY, SANDRA P · 2002 to 2011
$11.0M
INCREASING DIVERSITY IN CANCER CONTROL RESEARCHR25CA078583 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KAGAWA-SINGER, MARJORIE LOUISE, PASICK, RENA JOY · 1998 to 2017
$5.5M
Cooperative Planning of the SDSU/UCSD Cancer PartnershipU56CA092081 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NAVARRO, ANA M · 2002 to 2007
$2.2M
Cooperative Planning of the SDSU/UCSD Cancer Center Par*U56CA092079 · NCI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KLONOFF, ELIZABETH A · 2002 to 2007
$1.9M
COMMUNITY ONCOLOGISTS'CLINICAL TRIALS EDUCATION PROGRAMR25CA065745 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SADLER, GEORGIA ROBINS · 1995 to 2006
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS 5 P30 CA023100-22NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS R25 CA065745NCI NIH HHS R25 CA65745NCI NIH HHS R25 CA78583NCI NIH HHS U56 CA092079NCI NIH HHS U56 CA092081NCI NIH HHS U56 CA92079NCI NIH HHS U56 CA92081NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000220NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD00220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article discusses issues to be considered by nurse researchers when groups should be used as the unit of randomization. Advantages and disadvantages are presented, with statistical calculations needed to determine the effective sample size. Examples of these concepts are presented using data from the Black Cosmetologists Promoting Health Program. Different hypothetical scenarios and their impact on sample size are also presented. Given the complexity of calculating the sample size when using groups as the unit of randomization, it is advantageous for researchers to work closely with statisticians when designing and implementing studies that anticipate the use of groups as the unit of randomization.

Indexed as

Sampling StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID17693219
PMCPMC2128769
OpenAlexW2161552594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.