Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17692136›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2007

Selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: can too much of a good thing be a bad thing?

Daren K Heyland

Open access · goldAbstract readCommentEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Urosepsis--Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Review
  10. Selenium effect on oxidative stress factors in septic rats.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2014
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. [Immunonutrition after trauma].Der Unfallchirurg · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Update on postinjury nutrition.Current opinion in critical care · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daren K Heyland
Clinical Evaluation Research Unit · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent study by Forceville and colleagues evaluated the effect of high-dose selenium administration as a treatment for septic shock. The study was negative and conflicts with existing clinical data regarding selenium administration in critically ill patients. Perhaps the key to understanding the differences between these discrepant observations lies in considering the dose and timing of selenium administration.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsCritical IllnessDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansSeleniumShock, SepticTreatment OutcomeAntioxidantsSelenium

Identifiers

PMID17692136
PMCPMC2206521
OpenAlexW2024881598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.