Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17692125›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2007

Hitting bacteria at the heart of the central dogma: sequence-specific inhibition.

Louise Carøe Vohlander Rasmussen, Hans Uffe Sperling-Petersen, Kim Kusk Mortensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of accessible regions ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. An Investigation into the Potential of TargetingMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Vitamin BBiophysical journal · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Bridged Nucleic Acids Reloaded.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Artificial Activation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Amikacin: Uses, Resistance, and Prospects for Inhibition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Vitamin BScientific reports · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louise Carøe Vohlander RasmussenLaboratory of BioDesign, Department of Molecular Biology, Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 10 C, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. kkm@mb.au.dk.
Hans Uffe Sperling-Petersen
Kim Kusk Mortensen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important objective in developing new drugs is the achievement of high specificity to maximize curing effect and minimize side-effects, and high specificity is an integral part of the antisense approach. The antisense techniques have been extensively developed from the application of simple long, regular antisense RNA (asRNA) molecules to highly modified versions conferring resistance to nucleases, stability of hybrid formation and other beneficial characteristics, though still preserving the specificity of the original nucleic acids. These new and improved second- and third-generation antisense molecules have shown promising results. The first antisense drug has been approved and more are in clinical trials. However, these antisense drugs are mainly designed for the treatment of different human cancers and other human diseases. Applying antisense gene silencing and exploiting RNA interference (RNAi) are highly developed approaches in many eukaryotic systems. But in bacteria RNAi is absent, and gene silencing by antisense compounds is not nearly as well developed, despite its great potential and the intriguing possibility of applying antisense molecules in the fight against multiresistant bacteria. Recent breakthrough and current status on the development of antisense gene silencing in bacteria including especially phosphorothioate oligonucleotides (PS-ODNs), peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) and phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMOs) will be presented in this review.

Identifiers

PMID17692125
PMCPMC1995221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.