ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2007
Fast track referral for cancer.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concordance with urgent referral guidelines in patients presenting with any of six 'alarm' features of possible cancer: a retrospective cohort study using linked primary care records.BMJ quality & safety · 2022Article
- Comparison of the urgent referral for suspected breast cancer process with patient age and a predictive multivariable model.BJS open · 2021Article
- Patient experience a vital consideration in crafting solutions for healthcare challenges.The Australasian medical journal · 2016Article
- Medicine an evolving profession.The Australasian medical journal · 2013Article
- Five misconceptions in cancer diagnosis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009Article
- [Paradoxes in referral from primary to specialist care].Atencion primaria · 2008Article
- Referring patients to specialists: a structured vignette survey of Australian and British GPs.BMC family practice · 2008Article
- Two week rule: Breast cancer experience has wider implications.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.