ArticleGenome research2007
Conrad: gene prediction using conditional random fields.
Article in Genome research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- An overview of computational methods for gene prediction in eukaryotes: strengths, limitations, and future directions.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Review
- Analysis of metagenomic data.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025Article
- TSSFinder-fast and accurate ab initio prediction of the core promoter in eukaryotic genomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Procleave: Predicting Protease-specific Substrate Cleavage Sites by Combining Sequence and Structural Information.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2020Article
- TaF: a web platform for taxonomic profile-based fungal gene prediction.Genes & genomics · 2019Article
- Seqping: gene prediction pipeline for plant genomes using self-training gene models and transcriptomic data.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Analysis and prediction of the critical regions of antimicrobial peptides based on conditional random fields.PloS one · 2015Article
- SnowyOwl: accurate prediction of fungal genes by using RNA-Seq and homology information to select among ab initio models.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Comparative genomics of emerging pathogens in the Candida glabrata clade.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Estimating absolute methylation levels at single-CpG resolution from methylation enrichment and restriction enzyme sequencing methods.Genome research · 2013Article
- Next-generation annotation of prokaryotic genomes with EuGene-P: application to Sinorhizobium meliloti 2011.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2013Article
- Article
- DNA-energetics-based analyses suggest additional genes in prokaryotes.Journal of biosciences · 2012Article
- A beginner's guide to eukaryotic genome annotation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2012Review
- CTF: a CRF-based transcription factor binding sites finding system.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Article
- Prediction of conserved precursors of miRNAs and their mature forms by integrating position-specific structural features.PloS one · 2012Article
- A motif-independent metric for DNA sequence specificity.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Approaches to Fungal Genome Annotation.Mycology · 2011Article
- Genome-wide discovery of human heart enhancers.Genome research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We present Conrad, the first comparative gene predictor based on semi-Markov conditional random fields (SMCRFs). Unlike the best standalone gene predictors, which are based on generalized hidden Markov models (GHMMs) and trained by maximum likelihood, Conrad is discriminatively trained to maximize annotation accuracy. In addition, unlike the best annotation pipelines, which rely on heuristic and ad hoc decision rules to combine standalone gene predictors with additional information such as ESTs and protein homology, Conrad encodes all sources of information as features and treats all features equally in the training and inference algorithms. Conrad outperforms the best standalone gene predictors in cross-validation and whole chromosome testing on two fungi with vastly different gene structures. The performance improvement arises from the SMCRF's discriminative training methods and their ability to easily incorporate diverse types of information by encoding them as feature functions. On Cryptococcus neoformans, configuring Conrad to reproduce the predictions of a two-species phylo-GHMM closely matches the performance of Twinscan. Enabling discriminative training increases performance, and adding new feature functions further increases performance, achieving a level of accuracy that is unprecedented for this organism. Similar results are obtained on Aspergillus nidulans comparing Conrad versus Fgenesh. SMCRFs are a promising framework for gene prediction because of their highly modular nature, simplifying the process of designing and testing potential indicators of gene structure. Conrad's implementation of SMCRFs advances the state of the art in gene prediction in fungi and provides a robust platform for both current application and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.