Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17689240›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2007

Logic of gene regulatory networks.

Stefan C Materna, Eric H Davidson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Design specifications for cellular regulation.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Extended evolution: A conceptual framework for integrating regulatory networks and niche construction.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Geometric control of tissue morphogenesis.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2009
    Review
  13. The sea urchin genome as a window on function.The Biological bulletin · 2008
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefan C MaternaCalifornia Institute of Technology, Division of Biology, m/c 156-29, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Eric H Davidson

Funding

Transcriptional Casualty in Embryonic Morphogenesis: from the Specifications GRNP01HD037105 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DAVIDSON, ERIC H · 1999 to 2018
$27.1M
NICHD NIH HHS HD-37105NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD037105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory networks of transcription factors and signaling molecules lie at the heart of development. Their architecture implements logic functions whose execution propels cells from one regulatory state to the next, thus driving development forward. As an example of a subcircuit that translates transcriptional input into developmental output, we consider a particularly simple case, the regulatory processes underlying pigment cell formation in sea urchin embryos. The regulatory events in this process can be represented as elementary logic functions.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCell LineageGene Regulatory NetworksModels, BiologicalSea Urchins

Identifiers

PMID17689240
PMCPMC2031216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.