Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17688761›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2007

Predictive value of tonometry with Tono-pen XL in primary care.

Pedro Beneyto, Miguel A Barajas, Francisa Garcia-de-Blas, Isabel Del Cura, Teresa Sanz, Rocio Vello, Carmela Salvador

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pedro BeneytoDepartment of Opthalmology, Severo Ochoa Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel A Barajas
Francisa Garcia-de-Blas
Isabel Del Cura
Teresa Sanz
Rocio Vello
Carmela Salvador
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a descriptive study designed to assess the predictive value of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement in GPs' offices in an urban healthcare site using Tono-pen XL. A total of 2044 patients, aged > or =40 years, were enrolled by consecutive sampling from patients visiting the GP. Those participants who had IOP > or =21 mmHg were referred to the ophthalmologist. Of the 226 then tested, ocular hypertension was confirmed in 100 participants (4.89%, 95% CI [confidence interval] = 3.93 to 5.85%). Predictive value was 44.2%. These results suggest the validity of using Tono-pen XL in the GP's office to detect ocular hypertension.

Indexed as

Family PracticeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedOcular HypertensionPredictive Value of TestsSpainTonometry, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID17688761
PMCPMC2099672
OpenAlexW2133636955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.