ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2007
A case-control study of presentations in general practice before diagnosis of coeliac disease.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical presentation of celiac disease in adult patients: current real‑life experience: comment.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- An Investigation Into What Factors Influence Patterns of Clinical Presentation in Adult-Onset Celiac Disease.Cureus · 2022Article
- Do gastroenterologists have medical inertia towards coeliac disease? A UK multicentre secondary care study.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Determining whether coeliac disease case-finding in primary care is better than random testing: a retrospective study.BJGP open · 2019Article
- Prevalence and Clinical Features of Celiac Disease in Healthy School-Aged Children.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
- Depression and insomnia among individuals with celiac disease or on a gluten-free diet in the USA: results from a national survey.European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Article
- Psychological morbidity of celiac disease: A review of the literature.United European gastroenterology journal · 2015Review
- Anxiety and depression in adult patients with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet.World journal of gastroenterology · 2010Article
- A short review of malabsorption and anemia.World journal of gastroenterology · 2009Review
- Interaction between psychiatric and autoimmune disorders in coeliac disease patients in the Northeastern United States.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2009Article
- The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case-control study using electronic primary care records.British journal of cancer · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelay in the diagnosis of coeliac disease prolongs morbidity and may increase mortality. Little is known about presentations in general practice that may predict a subsequent diagnosis of coeliac disease.
aimTo examine presentations in general practice during the 5 years prior to diagnosis of coeliac disease. DESIGN OF STUDY: A case-control study with each biopsy-proven coeliac disease case matched by age, sex, and general practice to an average of two controls.
settingThirty-seven general practices in south-east Wales.
methodCases were identified via a secondary care clinic and controls recruited from the general practices of cases. General practice clinical records of both cases and controls were analysed to determine frequency of consultations, presenting symptoms, diagnoses, referrals, and investigations during the 5 years prior to diagnosis.
resultsCases (n = 68) had an increased number of consultations compared with controls (n = 160) during the 5 years prior to diagnosis (mean difference five consultations, P = 0.001). Three clinical features were independently associated with subsequent diagnosis of coeliac disease: depression and/or anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 5.7, P = 0.031); diarrhoea (OR = 4.5, 95% CI = 2.0 to 10.0, P <0.001); and anaemia (OR = 26.3, 95% CI = 5.7 to 120.6, P <0.001). Both diarrhoea and anaemia remained associated even when data for the year prior to diagnosis was excluded from the analysis.
conclusion[corrected] GPs should consider testing for coeliac disease when patients present often, especially with diarrhoea and/or who are discovered to be anaemic. Further research is required to clarify the role of depression and/or anxiety in the diagnosis of coeliac disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17688758PMC2099669What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.