Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17687620›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2007

Entropy-based joint analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies.

Guolian Kang, Yijun Zuo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guolian KangDepartment of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. kangg@stt.msu.edu.
Yijun ZuoDepartment of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are being conducted to identify common genetic variants that predispose to human diseases to unravel the genetic etiology of complex human diseases now. Because of genotyping cost constraints, it often follows a two-stage design, in which a large number of markers are identified in a proportion of the available samples in stage 1, and then the markers identified in stage 1 are examined in all the samples in stage 2. In this paper, we introduce a nonlinear entropy-based statistic for joint analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Type I error rates and power of the entropy-based statistic for association tests are validated using simulation studies in single-locus test. The power of entropy-based joint analysis is investigated by simulations. And the results suggest that entropy-based joint analysis is always more powerful than linear joint analysis that uses a linear function of risk allele frequencies in cases and controls when detecting rare genetic variants; the powers of these two joint analyses are comparable when detecting common genetic variants. Furthermore, when the false discovery rate is controlled, entropy-based joint analysis is more powerful and needs fewer samples than linear joint analysis that uses a linear function of risk allele frequencies in cases and controls. So, we recommend we should use entropy-based strategy for two-stage genome-wide association studies to detect the rare and common genetic variants with moderate to large genetic effect underlying a complex disease.

Indexed as

Gene FrequencyGenetic VariationGenome, HumanEntropyGenomicsHumansLinkage DisequilibriumModels, Statistical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.