ArticleJournal of human genetics2007
Entropy-based joint analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Information Theory in Computational Biology: Where We Stand Today.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Multi-strategy genome-wide association studies identify the DCAF16-NCAPG region as a susceptibility locus for average daily gain in cattle.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- A new system identification approach to identify genetic variants in sequencing studies for a binary phenotype.Human heredity · 2014Article
- Gene-based Genomewide Association Analysis: A Comparison Study.Current genomics · 2013Article
- Genetic association studies: an information content perspective.Current genomics · 2012Article
- Phenomics: the systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale.Neuroscience · 2009Article
- Two-stage designs to identify the effects of SNP combinations on complex diseases.Journal of human genetics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are being conducted to identify common genetic variants that predispose to human diseases to unravel the genetic etiology of complex human diseases now. Because of genotyping cost constraints, it often follows a two-stage design, in which a large number of markers are identified in a proportion of the available samples in stage 1, and then the markers identified in stage 1 are examined in all the samples in stage 2. In this paper, we introduce a nonlinear entropy-based statistic for joint analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Type I error rates and power of the entropy-based statistic for association tests are validated using simulation studies in single-locus test. The power of entropy-based joint analysis is investigated by simulations. And the results suggest that entropy-based joint analysis is always more powerful than linear joint analysis that uses a linear function of risk allele frequencies in cases and controls when detecting rare genetic variants; the powers of these two joint analyses are comparable when detecting common genetic variants. Furthermore, when the false discovery rate is controlled, entropy-based joint analysis is more powerful and needs fewer samples than linear joint analysis that uses a linear function of risk allele frequencies in cases and controls. So, we recommend we should use entropy-based strategy for two-stage genome-wide association studies to detect the rare and common genetic variants with moderate to large genetic effect underlying a complex disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17687620What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.