ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007
Identification of dermatophytes by an oligonucleotide array.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- PCR-Based Microarray Enhances Diagnosis of Culture-Negative Biopsied Tissue in Patients with Invasive Mold Infections: Real-World Experience in a Tertiary Medical Center.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Molecular Characterization of Dermatophyte species from rural tertiary care hospital: A Study Protocol.F1000Research · 2024Article
- Rapid and Accurate Diagnosis of Dermatophyte Infections Using the DendrisCHIPDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Hundred Years of Diagnosing Superficial Fungal Infections: Where Do We Come From, Where Are We Now and Where Would We Like To Go?Acta dermato-venereologica · 2020Article
- Detection of Dermatophytes from Dermatophytosis-Suspected Cases in Iran, Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction-Sequencing Method.Advanced biomedical research · 2020Article
- Reappraisal of Conventional Diagnosis for Dermatophytes.Mycopathologia · 2017Review
- Rapid detection of dermatophytes and Candida albicans in onychomycosis specimens by an oligonucleotide array.BMC infectious diseases · 2014Article
- Microsporum fulvum, an ignored pathogenic dermatophyte: a new clinical isolation from Iran.Mycopathologia · 2013Article
- Rapid identification of allergenic and pathogenic molds in environmental air by an oligonucleotide array.BMC infectious diseases · 2011Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species of dermatophytes are classified into three anamorphic (asexual) genera, Epidermophyton, Microsporum, and Trichophyton. Conventional methods used to identify dermatophytes are often lengthy and may be inconclusive because of atypical microscopic or colony morphology. Based on the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS-1) and ITS-2 sequences of the rRNA genes, an oligonucleotide array was developed to identify 17 dermatophyte species. The method consisted of PCR amplification of the ITS regions using universal primers, followed by hybridization of the digoxigenin-labeled PCR products to an array of oligonucleotides (17- to 30-mers) immobilized on a nylon membrane. Of 198 dermatophyte strains and 90 nontarget strains tested, the sensitivity and specificity of the array were 99.5% and 97.8%, respectively. The only strain not identified (Microsporum audouinii LMA 597) was found to have a nucleotide insertion at the ITS-2 region where the probe was designed. Two nontarget strains, Microsporum equinum LMA 40396666 and Trichophyton gourvilii var. intermedium CBS 170.65, were misidentified as Microsporum canis and Trichophyton soudanense, respectively. Sequence analysis of the ITS regions revealed that the two misidentified strains displayed high sequence homology with the probes designed for M. canis and T. soudanense, respectively. The present method can be used as a reliable alternative to conventional identification methods and can be completed with isolated colonies within 24 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.