Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17687008›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

Investigation of reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients in Ireland and evaluation of agar screening methods for detection of heterogeneously glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus.

Margaret M Fitzgibbon, Angela S Rossney, Brian O'Connell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 is an increasing cause of disease in people with no livestock contact in Denmark, 1999 to 2011.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margaret M FitzgibbonNational MRSA Reference Laboratory, St. James's Hospital, James's St., Dublin 8, Ireland.
Angela S Rossney
Brian O'Connell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates (n = 3,189) from 2,990 patients were investigated by agar screening and by the Etest macromethod for reduced susceptibility to glycopeptide. No vancomycin-resistant S. aureus or glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) isolates were detected, but 178 isolates were confirmed as hetero-GISA (hGISA) by vancomycin population analysis profile (vPAP)-area under the curve (AUC) ratio determination and/or teicoplanin PAP (tPAP) methods. Of 139 isolates detected using the recommended Etest macromethod cutoff values of > or =8 mg/liter for both vancomycin and teicoplanin or > or =12 mg/liter for teicoplanin alone, 73 were confirmed as hGISA by vPAP-AUC, 95 were confirmed as hGISA by tPAP, and 108 were confirmed as hGISA by both methods. An Etest macromethod cutoff value of 8 mg/liter for teicoplanin alone detected a further 70 hGISA (17 were confirmed by vPAP-AUC and 70 were confirmed by tPAP). Agar screening utilizing brain heart infusion (BHI) agar containing 6 mg of vancomycin/liter (BHIV6) and Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar containing 8 mg of teicoplanin/liter (MHT8) failed to detect hGISA. MH agar containing 5 mg of teicoplanin/liter (MHT5) and BHI containing 5 mg of teicoplanin/liter (BHIT5) were evaluated using 10-microl volumes of three inoculum concentrations (with densities equivalent to 0.5 and 2.0 McFarland turbidity standards and stationary-phase BHI broth subcultures [MHT5(0.5), MHT5(2.0), MHT5(S), BHIT5(0.5), BHIT5(2.0), and BHIT5(S)]). The sensitivity of all methods except MHT5(0.5) and MHT5(2.0) was 100%. The specificity ranged from 4 to 82%. BHIT5(0.5) yielded the best performance, with a specificity of 84% for detecting isolates with teicoplanin Etest macromethod values of > or =8 mg/liter. Screening on BHIT5(0.5) is useful where screen-positive isolates are investigated with the Etest macromethod and confirmed by vPAP-AUC and tPAP. The prevalence of hGISA among patients with blood culture isolates recovered in Irish hospitals between 1999 and 2003 was 2.6%, whereas the prevalence among patients with isolates from all specimen sites collected during a 2-week survey in 1999 was 12%. The prevalence in one hospital decreased from 5.3% in 2003 to 1.5% in 2004.

Indexed as

Methicillin ResistanceAgarAnti-Bacterial AgentsGlycopeptidesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusTeicoplaninVancomycin ResistanceAgarAnti-Bacterial AgentsGlycopeptidesTeicoplanin

Identifiers

PMID17687008
PMCPMC2045355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.