Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17686733›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2007

Neopolyploidy and pathogen resistance.

Benjamin P Oswald, Scott L Nuismer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Apple Autotetraploids with Enhanced Resistance to Apple Scab (International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Changes to gene expression associated with hybrid speciation in plants: further insights from transcriptomic studies in Senecio.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin P OswaldBioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA. pikabika@gmail.com
Scott L Nuismer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the well-documented historical importance of polyploidy, the mechanisms responsible for the establishment and evolutionary success of novel polyploid lineages remain unresolved. One possibility, which has not been previously evaluated theoretically, is that novel polyploid lineages are initially more resistant to pathogens than the diploid progenitor species. Here, we explore this possibility by developing and analysing mathematical models of interactions between newly formed polyploid lineages and their pathogens. We find that for the genetic mechanisms of pathogen resistance with the best empirical support, newly formed polyploid populations of hosts are expected to be more resistant than their diploid progenitors. This effect can be quite strong and, in the case of perennial species with recurrent polyploid formation, may last indefinitely, potentially providing a general explanation for the successful establishment of novel polyploid lineages.

Indexed as

PolyploidyAllelesComputer SimulationImmunity, InnateModels, BiologicalPlant DiseasesPlants

Identifiers

PMID17686733
PMCPMC2274975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.