Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17683973›Full record

ReviewCytokine & growth factor reviews

STAT dynamics.

Nancy C Reich

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytokine & growth factor reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Mechanism of Interferon Refractoriness During Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Its Reversal with a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α Agonist.Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nancy C ReichDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5222, United States. nreich@notes.cc.sunysb.edu
Stony Brook University · US

Funding

TUMOR VIRUS-HOST INTERACTIONSP01CA028146 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI HEARING, PATRICK · 1986 to 2005
$9.9M
CELLULAR &ONCOGENIC CONTROL OF INTERFERON INDUCED GENESR01CA050773 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI REICH, NANCY C. · 1995 to 2004
$1.3M
Regulation of STAT3 SignalingR01CA122910 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI REICH MARSHALL, NANCY C. · 2007 to 2010
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA028146NCI NIH HHS P01CA2814NCI NIH HHS R01 CA050773NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of transcription factors to gain entrance to the nucleus is critical to their role in gene expression. Signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) are latent DNA binding factors activated by specific tyrosine phosphorylation. There are seven mammalian STAT genes encoding proteins that display constitutive nuclear localization and/or conditional nuclear localization. This review will focus on STAT1 and STAT2 that are activated in response to interferon and exhibit conditional nuclear localization. The dynamic redistribution of STAT1 and STAT2 between the cytoplasm and the nucleus is coordinate with their gain of ability to bind DNA.

Indexed as

AnimalsSTAT1 Transcription FactorSTAT2 Transcription FactorSTAT1 Transcription FactorSTAT2 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID17683973
PMCPMC2683581
OpenAlexW4235530169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.