Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17682051›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2007

Conformational changes in the GTPase modules of the signal reception particle and its receptor drive initiation of protein translocation.

Shu-ou Shan, Sowmya Chandrasekar, Peter Walter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Dynamic SecYEG Translocon.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The SRP signal sequence of KdpD.Scientific reports · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Sequential activation of human signal recognition particle by the ribosome and signal sequence drives efficient protein targeting.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Regulation by a chaperone improves substrate selectivity during cotranslational protein targeting.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shu-ou ShanDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. sshan@caltech.edu
Sowmya Chandrasekar
Peter Walter
California Institute of Technology · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

MECHANISM OF PROTEIN TRANSLOCATION ACROSS MEMBRANESR01GM032384 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STROUD, ROBERT M · 1985 to 2023
$7.6M
Molecular Mechanism of Protein Targeting by the Signal Recognition ParticleR01GM078024 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SHAN, SHU-OU · 2007 to 2020
$4.4M
MECHANISM OF PROTEIN TRANSLOCATION ACROSS MEMBRANESR37GM032384 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI WALTER, PETER · 1993 to 2002
$907k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 32384NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032384NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078024NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM032384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During cotranslational protein targeting, two guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR) form a unique complex in which hydrolyses of both guanosine triphosphates (GTP) are activated in a shared active site. It was thought that GTP hydrolysis drives the recycling of SRP and SR, but is not crucial for protein targeting. Here, we examined the translocation efficiency of mutant GTPases that block the interaction between SRP and SR at specific stages. Surprisingly, mutants that allow SRP-SR complex assembly but block GTPase activation severely compromise protein translocation. These mutations map to the highly conserved insertion box domain loops that rearrange upon complex formation to form multiple catalytic interactions with the two GTPs. Thus, although GTP hydrolysis is not required, the molecular rearrangements that lead to GTPase activation are essential for protein targeting. Most importantly, our results show that an elaborate rearrangement within the SRP-SR GTPase complex is required to drive the unloading and initiate translocation of cargo proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsDogsGTP PhosphohydrolasesModels, BiologicalProtein ConformationProtein TransportReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, PeptideSignal Recognition ParticleBacterial ProteinsFtsY protein, BacteriaGTP PhosphohydrolasesReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, Peptidesignal peptide receptorSignal Recognition Particle

Identifiers

PMID17682051
PMCPMC2064468
OpenAlexW2144764975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.