Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17681181›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2007

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor promotes liver repair and induces oval cell migration and proliferation in rats.

Anna C Piscaglia, Thomas D Shupe, Seh-Hoon Oh, Antonio Gasbarrini, Bryon E Petersen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Emerging medical therapies for severe alcoholic hepatitis.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna C PiscagliaDepartment of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA. piscag@pathology.ufl.edu
Thomas D Shupe
Seh-Hoon Oh
Antonio Gasbarrini
Bryon E Petersen
University of Florida · USUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

Mechanisms of Oval Cell Activation and DifferentiationR01DK058614 · NIDDK · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PETERSEN, BRYON E · 2001 to 2014
$3.6M
Stem Cells in Liver Regeneration: Fusion or PlasticityR01DK065096 · NIDDK · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PETERSEN, BRYON E · 2005 to 2013
$2.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS 2R01DK058614-05NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK058614NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK065096NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK065096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsHepatic regeneration is a heterogeneous phenomenon involving several cell populations. Oval cells are considered liver stem cells, a portion of which derive from bone marrow (BM). Recent studies have shown that granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) may be effective in facilitating liver repair. However, it remains unclear if G-CSF acts by mobilizing BM cells, or if it acts locally within the liver microenvironment to facilitate the endogenous restoration program. In the present study, we assessed the involvement of G-CSF during oval cell activation.

methodsDipeptidyl-peptidase-IV-deficient female rats received BM transplants from wild-type male donors. Four weeks later, rats were subjected to the 2-acetylaminofluorene/partial hepatectomy model of oval cell-mediated liver regeneration, followed by administration of either nonpegylated G-CSF or pegylated G-CSF. Control animals did not receive further treatments after surgery. The magnitude of oval cell reaction, the entity of BM contribution to liver repopulation, as well as the G-CSF/G-CSF-receptor expression levels were evaluated. In addition, in vitro proliferation and migration assays were performed on freshly isolated oval cells.

resultsOval cells were found to express G-CSF receptor and G-CSF was produced within the regenerating liver. G-CSF administration significantly increased both the magnitude of the oval cell reaction, and the contribution of BM to liver repair. Finally, G-CSF acted as a chemoattractant and a mitogen for oval cells in vitro.

conclusionsWe have shown that G-CSF facilitates hepatic regeneration by increasing the migration of BM-derived progenitors to the liver, as well as enhancing the endogenous oval cell reaction.

Indexed as

Cell MovementCell ProliferationLiver Regeneration2-AcetylaminofluoreneAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAutocrine CommunicationBone Marrow CellsBone Marrow TransplantationCarcinogensCells, CulturedDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Dose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHepatectomy2-AcetylaminofluoreneCarcinogensDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorReceptors, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorThy-1 Antigens

Identifiers

PMID17681181
PMCPMC3130597
OpenAlexW2130703401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.