Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17681164›Full record

Trial reportGastroenterology2007

How does cognitive behavior therapy for irritable bowel syndrome work? A mediational analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

Jeffrey M Lackner, James Jaccard, Susan S Krasner, Leonard A Katz, Gregory D Gudleski, Edward B Blanchard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastroenterology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Self-administered cognitive behavior therapy for moderate to severe irritable bowel syndrome: clinical efficacy, tolerability, feasibility.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2008
    Trial
  16. Multidomain patient-reported outcomes of irritable bowel syndrome: exploring person-centered perspectives to better understand symptom severity scores.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
    Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey M LacknerDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14215, USA. lackner@buffalo.edu
James Jaccard
Susan S Krasner
Leonard A Katz
Gregory D Gudleski
Edward B Blanchard
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USAlbany State University · USFlorida International University · US

Funding

COGNITIVE THERAPY FOR IBS--OUTCOME, PROCESS &PREDICTIONR01DK054211 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI BLANCHARD, EDWARD B · 1999 to 2002
$1.5M
Development of limited contact CBT treatment for IBSR03DK067878 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LACKNER, JEFFREY M · 2004 to 2005
$314k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK054211NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK067878PHS HHS NIDDK 54211PHS HHS NIDDK 67878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAlthough multiple clinical trials support the efficacy of psychological treatments for reducing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms, the mechanisms responsible for symptomatic improvement are unknown. One hypothesis is that psychological treatments work by alleviating comorbid psychological distress implicated in the worsening of bowel symptoms and quality of life. An alternative hypothesis assumes that changes in distress are not strictly a cause but a consequence of IBS that will decrease with symptomatic improvement.

methodsWe evaluated these 2 hypotheses by applying structural equation modeling (SEM) to the data set of a large number (n = 147) of Rome II diagnosed participants randomized to CBT, psychoeducation, or wait list. Per Rome guidelines, the primary end point was global improvement of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms measured 2 weeks after a 10-week regimen. Secondary end points were distress and quality of life (QOL).

resultsSEM analyses lend support to a model in which CBT is associated with improvements in IBS symptoms, but that therapeutic gains do not depend on changes in patients' overall level of psychological distress. Symptom severity, but not clinical status (pain catastrophizing, predominant bowel habits, symptom duration, abuse, diagnosable psychiatric disorder) or relevant sociodemographic variables (eg, gender, age), moderated treatment outcome.

conclusionCBT has a direct effect on global IBS symptom improvement independent of its effects on distress. Improvement in IBS symptoms is associated with improvements in the QOL, which may lower distress. Symptom improvements are not moderated by variables reflecting the mental well-being of IBS patients.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyQuality of LifeAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalRegression AnalysisSeverity of Illness IndexSex FactorsStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID17681164
PMCPMC2645996
OpenAlexW1966768383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.