Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17679770›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2007

Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular detection of chloramphenicol and florfenicol resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from diseased chickens.

Xin Sheng Li, Gui Qin Wang, Xiang Dang Du, Bao An Cui, Su Mei Zhang, Jian Zhong Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria-A Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Spread of the florfenicol resistanceAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin Sheng LiCollege of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, PR China.
Gui Qin Wang
Xiang Dang Du
Bao An Cui
Su Mei Zhang
Jian Zhong Shen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seventy Escherichia coli isolates recovered from diseased chickens diagnosed with colibacillosis in Henan Province, China, between 2004 and 2005 were characterized for antimicrobial susceptibility profiles via a broth doubling dilution method. Overall, the isolates displayed resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (100%), oxytetracycline (100%), ampicillin (83%), enrofloxacin (83%), and ciprofloxacin (81%), respectively. Among the phenicols, resistance was approximately 79% and 29% for chloramphenicol and florfenicol, respectively. Molecular detection revealed that the incidence rates of the floR, cmlA, cat1, cat2 and cat3 were 29, 31, 16, 13, and 0%, respectively. Additionally, 10% of the isolates were positive for both floR and cmlA. As these antimicrobial agents may potentially induce cross-resistance between animal and human bacterial pathogens, their prudent use in veterinary medicine is highly recommended.

Indexed as

ChickensAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChinaChloramphenicolDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymerase Chain ReactionPoultry DiseasesThiamphenicolAnti-Bacterial AgentsChloramphenicolDNA, BacterialflorfenicolThiamphenicol

Identifiers

PMID17679770
PMCPMC2868130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.