Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17675543›Full record

ReviewPostgraduate medical journal2007

The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Glen M Blake, Ignac Fogelman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postgraduate medical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02534714 (Analysis of Hypovitaminosis D and Osteopenia/Osteoporosis in Spinal Disease Patients Who Underwent a Spinal Fusion at Illinois Neurological Institute, Peoria, IL., a Retrospective Review From November 1, 2012 to October 31, 2014 and Prospective Pilot From July 1, 2015-June 30, 2016), which is not on this map. Cited by 228 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
228citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02534714 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of Hypovitaminosis D and Osteopenia/Osteoporosis in Spinal Disease Patients Who Underwent a Spinal Fusion at Illinois Neurological Institute, Peoria, IL., a Retrospective Review From November 1, 2012 to October 31, 2014 and Prospective Pilot From July 1, 2015-June 30, 2016

TypeobservationalSponsorOSF Healthcare SystemRan2015Enrolled460ConditionsHypovitaminosis D, Spinal Disease, Osteoporosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

228 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article

168 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Glen M BlakeKing's College London School of Medicine, London, UK. glen.blake@kcl.ac.uk
Ignac Fogelman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans to measure bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine and hip have an important role in the evaluation of individuals at risk of osteoporosis, and in helping clinicians advise patients about the appropriate use of antifracture treatment. Compared with alternative bone densitometry techniques, hip and spine DXA examinations have a number of advantages that include a consensus that BMD results can be interpreted using the World Health Organization T-score definition of osteoporosis, a proven ability to predict fracture risk, proven effectiveness at targeting antifracture therapies, and the ability to monitor response to treatment. This review discusses the evidence for these and other clinical aspects of DXA scanning, including its role in the new WHO algorithm for treating patients on the basis of their individual fracture risk.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityFractures, BoneHumansOsteoporosisRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID17675543
PMCPMC2600106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.