ArticleBiophysical journal2007
Mechanisms of electrically mediated cytosolic Ca2+ transients in aequorin-transformed tobacco cells.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transmembrane potential measurements on plant cells using the voltage-sensitive dye ANNINE-6.Protoplasma · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytosolic Ca(2+) changes induced by electric field pulses of 50-micros duration and 200-800 V/cm strength were monitored by measuring chemiluminescence in aequorin-transformed BY-2 tobacco cells. In Ca(2+)-substituted media, electropulsing led to a very fast initial increase of the cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration reaching a peak value within <100-200 ms. Peaking of [Ca(2+)](cyt) was followed by a biphasic decay due to removal of Ca(2+) (e.g., by binding and/or sequestration in the cytosol). The decay had fast and slow components, characterized by time constants of approximately 0.5 and 3-5 s, respectively. Experiments with various external Ca(2+) concentrations and conductivities showed that the fast decay arises from Ca(2+) fluxes through the plasmalemma, whereas the slow decay must be assigned to Ca(2+) fluxes through the tonoplast. The amplitude of the [Ca(2+)](cyt) transients increased with increasing field strength, whereas the time constants of the decay kinetics remained invariant. Breakdown of the plasmalemma was achieved at a critical field strength of approximately 450 V/cm, whereas breakdown of the tonoplast required approximately 580 V/cm. The above findings could be explained by the transient potential profiles generated across the two membranes in response to an exponentially decaying field pulse. The dielectric data required for calculation of the tonoplast and plasmalemma potentials were derived from electrorotation experiments on isolated vacuolated and evacuolated BY-2 protoplasts. The electrorotation response of vacuolated protoplasts could be described in terms of a three-shell model (i.e., by assuming that the capacitances of tonoplast and plasmalemma are arranged in series). Among other things, the theoretical analysis together with the experimental data show that genetic manipulations of plant cells by electrotransfection or electrofusion must be performed in low-conductivity media to minimize release of vacuolar Ca(2+) and presumably other vacuolar ingredients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.