ArticleBiophysical journal2007
Eavesdropping on the social lives of Ca(2+) sparks.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Late CaCirculation research · 2018Article
- A unified theory of calcium alternans in ventricular myocytes.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Nonlinear and Stochastic Dynamics in the Heart.Physics reports · 2014Article
- Hierarchical clustering of ryanodine receptors enables emergence of a calcium clock in sinoatrial node cells.The Journal of general physiology · 2014Article
- Calcium alternans in cardiac myocytes: order from disorder.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2013Review
- Engineered human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac cells and tissues for electrophysiological studies.Drug discovery today. Disease models · 2012Article
- T-wave alternans and arrhythmogenesis in cardiac diseases.Frontiers in physiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Ca(2+) sparks arise from the stochastic opening of spatially discrete clusters of ryanodine receptors called a Ca(2+) release unit (CRU). If the RyR clusters were not spatially separated, then Ca(2+) released from one RyR would immediately diffuse to its neighbor and lead to uncontrolled, runaway Ca(2+) release throughout the cell. While physical separation provides some isolation from neighbors, CRUs are not incommunicado. When inter-neighbor interactions become large enough, Ca(2+) waves spontaneously emerge. A more circumscribed interaction shows up in high-speed two-dimensional confocal images as jumping Ca(2+) sparks that seem to be sequentially activated along the Z-line and across Z-lines. However, since Ca(2+) sparks are stochastic events how can we tell whether two sparks occurring close together in space and time are causally related or appeared simply by coincidence? Here we develop a mathematical method to disentangle cause and coincidence in a statistical sense. From our analysis we derive three fundamental properties of Ca(2+) spark generation: 1), the "intrinsic" spark frequency, the spark frequency one would observe if the CRUs were incommunicado; 2), the coupling strength, which measures how strongly one CRU affects another; and 3), the range over which the communication occurs. These parameters allow us to measure the effect RyR regulators have on the intrinsic activity of CRUs and on the coupling between them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.