ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2007
Recommendation recall and satisfaction after attending breast/ovarian cancer risk counseling.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Optimizing outcomes, mechanisms, and recall of Cognitive Therapy for depression: Dose of constructive memory support strategies.Behaviour research and therapy · 2023Trial
- Serial Mediators of Memory Support Strategies Used With Cognitive Therapy for Depression: Improving Outcomes Through Patient Adherence and Treatment Skills.Behavior therapy · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Patient recall of specific cognitive therapy contents predicts adherence and outcome in adults with major depressive disorder.Behaviour research and therapy · 2017Trial
- Memory support strategies and bundles: A pathway to improving cognitive therapy for depression?Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2017Trial
- Do improved patient recall and the provision of memory support enhance treatment adherence?Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry · 2017Trial
- Memory for therapy in bipolar disorder and comorbid insomnia.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2015Trial
- Do the Memory Support Intervention and Improving Memory for Treatment Facilitate Behavior Change in Cognitive Therapy?Cognitive therapy and research · 2026Article
- Maximizing benefits from evidence-based psychological treatments: Memory support and habit formation as key strategies.Behaviour research and therapy · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Memory and learning for sleep and circadian treatment in serious mental illness treated in a community mental health setting.Behaviour research and therapy · 2022Article
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Adherence to Healthcare Recommendations Made Through a Distance-Delivered Survivorship Program.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of a French Version of the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale (GCSS) as an Outcome Measure of Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Development and Validation of the Memory Support Treatment Provider Checklist.Behavior therapy · 2021Article
- Stakeholders' views on the value of outcomes from clinical genetic and genomic interventions.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- The development and validation of the Memory Support Rating Scale.Psychological assessment · 2016Article
- Learning cognitive behavior therapy.Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry · 2015Article
- Improving Outcome of Psychosocial Treatments by Enhancing Memory and Learning.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined women's recall of physician recommendations as well as patient satisfaction following participation in a breast/ovarian cancer risk and prevention program. Participants were 41 high risk women who attended a cancer risk program 4-6 months earlier. Two-thirds of women who received recommendations for tamoxifen treatment and genetic testing did not recall these recommendations upon follow-up. A number of women misunderstood recommendations and a quarter of the sample recalled recommendations that were not made during the consultation. Although these high risk women were generally satisfied with their counseling visit, those individuals who received particularly complex sets of recommendations reported feeling less understood and were less satisfied with the counseling. Findings underline the importance of examining recommendation recall, in addition to perceptions of cancer risk, when evaluating the clinical implications of cancer risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.