Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17674075›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2007

Similarity of synonymous substitution rates across mammalian genomes.

Jeffrey H Chuang, Hao Li

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeffrey H ChuangDepartment of Biology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA. chuangj@bc.edu
Hao Li

Funding

Structure function and evolution of yeast transcription networksR01GM070808 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LI, HAO · 2004 to 2012
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM70808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given that a gene has a high (or low) synonymous substitution rate in one mammalian species, will it also have a high (or low) synonymous substitution rate in another mammalian species? Such similarities in the rate of synonymous substitution can reveal both selective pressures and neutral processes acting on mammalian gene sequences; however, the existence of such an effect has been a matter of disagreement. We resolve whether such synonymous substitution rate similarities exist using 7462 ortholog triplets aligned across rat, mouse, and human, a dataset two orders of magnitude larger than previous studies. We find that a gene's synonymous substitution rate in the rat-mouse branch of the phylogeny is correlated with its rate in the branch connecting human and the rat-mouse ancestor. We confirm this for several different measures of synonymous substitution rate, including corrections for base composition and CpG dinucleotides, and we verify the results in the larger mouse-human-rat-dog phylogeny. This similarity of rates is most apparent for genes in which synonymous sites are well conserved across species, suggesting that a significant component of the effect is due to purifying selection. We observe rate correlations at a resolution as fine as a few hundred kilobases, and the genes with the most similar synonymous substitution rates are enriched for regulatory functions. Genes with above-average substitution rates also exhibit significant, though somewhat weaker, rate correlations, suggesting that some neutral processes may have persisted in the phylogeny as well.

Indexed as

GenomePoint MutationAnimalsDNA Mutational AnalysisDogsEvolution, MolecularHumansMammalsMiceRatsSelection, GeneticSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.