Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17673815›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2007

Prognostic factors in gallbladder and biliary tract cancer.

Xóchitl Gómez-Roel, Oscar Arrieta, Eucario León-Rodríguez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xóchitl Gómez-RoelDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Institute Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición, Mexico City.
Oscar Arrieta
Eucario León-Rodríguez
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancers of the gallbladder and bile ducts are uncommon neoplasms with poor survival. Prognostic factors are not well defined because of the scant number of patients reported through series of cases.

methodsWe reviewed the medical records of patients with cancer of the bile ducts and gallbladder between the years 1979 and 1998, and analyzed their characteristics according to location (gallbladder, extrahepatic biliary tract, intrahepatic biliary tract, and Klatskin tumors).

resultsOne hundred and sixty-eight patients were included; the mean follow-up time was 238 +/- 54 d. The tumor found at more advanced stages was the biliary tract tumor. Overall survival time was 254 +/- 40 d. Location did not influence survival. The factors significantly associated to increased survival were age at diagnosis less than 50 yr (p = 0.0065), surgical treatment (p < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (p < 0.001 and p = 0.0072, respectively), surgical treatment with curative purpose (p < 0.001), stage of the disease (p < 0.0001), absence of jaundice (p = 0.0425), and absence of weight loss (p = 0.0446). In the multivariate analysis the significant variables were age, surgical treatment, adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery with curative purpose, stage of the disease, and absence of jaundice.

conclusionsCancers of the bile ducts are neoplasms known to have a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy was an independent survival factor despite the context, there is need of future studies to define its role on this disease.

Indexed as

AgedBiliary Tract NeoplasmsFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsHumansJaundiceMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPalliative CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID17673815
OpenAlexW2045081625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.