Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17671644›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2007

Proteinuria: is it all in the foot?

Pierre Ronco

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Human genetics of nephrotic syndrome and the quest for precision medicine.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cell biology and pathology of podocytes.Annual review of physiology · 2012
    Review
  20. Podocyte dysfunction in aging--related glomerulosclerosis.Frontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition) · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pierre RoncoINSERM UMR S 702, University Pierre et Marie Curie, and Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France. pierre.ronco@tnn.aphp.fr
Hôpital Tenon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant advances in our understanding of the molecular structure and composition of the glomerular filtration barrier, the mechanisms underlying the presence of excess protein in the urine (proteinuria) in acquired human kidney diseases remain elusive. In a study appearing in this issue of the JCI, Sever and associates use a combination of biochemical, genetic, and in vivo approaches in mice to demonstrate a pivotal role of cathepsin L and its substrate the GTPase dynamin, in the induction of proteinuria and associated foot process effacement in glomerular podocytes (see the related article beginning on page 2095).

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsCathepsin LCathepsinsCells, CulturedCysteine EndopeptidasesCytoskeletonDynaminsKidney DiseasesMiceMutationPodocytesProteinuriaActinsCathepsin LCathepsinsCTSL protein, humanCtsl protein, mouseCysteine EndopeptidasesDynamins

Identifiers

PMID17671644
PMCPMC1934599
OpenAlexW2146970982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.