Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17670981›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2007

Desensitization properties of AMPA receptors at the cerebellar mossy fiber granule cell synapse.

David A DiGregorio, Jason S Rothman, Thomas A Nielsen, R Angus Silver

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. How and Why the Cerebellum Recodes Input Signals: An Alternative to Machine Learning.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. CaThe Journal of physiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Light-coupled cryo-plunger for time-resolved cryo-EM.Journal of structural biology · 2020
    Article
  18. TARPs Modulate Receptor-Mediated Paired-Pulse Depression and Recovery from Desensitization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David A DiGregorioDepartment of Physiology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Jason S Rothman
Thomas A Nielsen
R Angus Silver
University College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400598Wellcome Trust 064413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native AMPA receptors (AMPARs) exhibit rapid and profound desensitization in the sustained presence of glutamate. Desensitization therefore contributes to short-term depression at synapses in which glutamate accumulates. At synapses that do not exhibit desensitization-dependent depression, AMPARs are thought to be protected against prolonged or repetitive exposure to synaptically released glutamate. At the cerebellar mossy fiber to granule cell (GC) synapse, in which high release probability and glutamate spillover produce a substantial buildup of glutamate concentration in the cleft ([Glut]cleft) during high-frequency transmission, only moderate desensitization of the phasic AMPAR EPSC occurs. To investigate how such currents are produced, we examined the kinetic properties of synaptic AMPARs in GCs using glutamate uncaging. Photolysis of 4-methoxy-7-nitroindolinyl-caged L-glutamate with large illumination spots produced step-like increases in [Glut]cleft that could be used to systematically probe AMPAR kinetics. At low levels of activation, synaptic AMPARs exhibited little desensitization. With larger activations, the desensitization time course became faster, but the level of desensitization was only weakly dependent on receptor occupancy. Indeed, a substantial desensitization-resistant current component remained (17%) in saturating glutamate. Photolysis with small illumination spots produced brief [Glut]cleft waveforms and transient AMPAR activations, similar to the EPSC current components. Paired-pulse uncaging with such spots revealed little desensitization after spillover-like activations and modest depression after activations that mimicked quantal and spillover components together. Our results show that GC AMPARs exhibit a resistance to desensitization at low occupancies and that this property is crucial for sustaining high-frequency transmission at a synapse in which glutamate accumulates.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornCerebellumExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsNerve FibersRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, AMPASynapsesSynaptic TransmissionTime FactorsReceptors, AMPA

Identifiers

PMID17670981
PMCPMC6147216
OpenAlexW2090247232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.