Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17670909›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2007

Antenatal education and postnatal support strategies for improving rates of exclusive breast feeding: randomised controlled trial.

Lin-Lin Su, Yap-Seng Chong, Yiong-Huak Chan, Yah-Shih Chan, Doris Fok, Kay-Thwe Tun, Faith S P Ng, Mary Rauff

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00270920 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Antenatal Preparation and Postnatal Counseling Strategies for Improving Breastfeeding Rates

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Hospital, SingaporeRan2004 to 2006Enrolled450ConditionsBreastfeedingArmsLactation counseling
NCT02738957 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Prenatal Counseling on Breastfeeding Rates in Twins

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2009 to 2014Enrolled116ConditionsBreastfeedingArmsPrenatal Counseling Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  11. Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lin-Lin SuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119074.
Yap-Seng Chong
Yiong-Huak Chan
Yah-Shih Chan
Doris Fok
Kay-Thwe Tun
Faith S P Ng
Mary Rauff

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether antenatal breast feeding education alone or postnatal lactation support alone improves rates of exclusive breast feeding compared with routine hospital care.

designRandomised controlled trial.

settingA tertiary hospital in Singapore.

participants450 women with uncomplicated pregnancies.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were rates of exclusive breast feeding at discharge from hospital and two weeks, six weeks, three months, and six months after delivery. Secondary outcomes were rates of any breast feeding.

resultsCompared with women who received routine care, women in the postnatal support group were more likely to breastfeed exclusively at two weeks (relative risk 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 2.90), six weeks (1.85, 1.11 to 3.09), three months (1.87, 1.03 to 3.41), and six months (2.12, 1.03 to 4.37) postnatally. Women receiving antenatal education were more likely to breast feed exclusively at six weeks (1.73, 1.04 to 2.90), three months (1.92, 1.07 to 3.48), and six months (2.16, 1.05 to 4.43) postnatally. The numbers needed to treat to achieve one woman exclusively breast feeding at six months were 11 (6 to 80) for postnatal support and 10 (6 to 60) for antenatal education. Women who received postnatal support were more likely to exclusively or predominantly breast feed two weeks after delivery compared with women who received antenatal education (1.53, 1.01 to 2.31). The rate of any breastfeeding six weeks after delivery was also higher in the postnatal support group compared with women who received routine care (1.16, 1.02 to 1.31).

conclusionsAntenatal breast feeding education and postnatal lactation support, as single interventions based in hospital both significantly improve rates of exclusive breast feeding up to six months after delivery. Postnatal support was marginally more effective than antenatal education.

trial registrationClinical Trials NCT00270920 [ClinicalTrials.gov].

Indexed as

Breast FeedingFemaleHumansPatient Education as TopicPostnatal CarePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareSingaporeSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID17670909
PMCPMC1989016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.