Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17670800›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2007

Capture of linear fragments at a double-strand break in yeast.

Anat Haviv-Chesner, Yoshifumi Kobayashi, Abram Gabriel, Martin Kupiec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intron creation and DNA repair.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2009
    Review
  10. Human Rad52-mediated homology search and annealing occurs by continuous interactions between overlapping nucleoprotein complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetic Susceptibility to Rhodococcus equi.Journal of veterinary internal medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anat Haviv-ChesnerGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey and Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Yoshifumi Kobayashi
Abram Gabriel
Martin Kupiec

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are dangerous chromosomal lesions that must be efficiently repaired in order to avoid loss of genetic information or cell death. In all organisms studied to date, two different mechanisms are used to repair DSBs: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Previous studies have shown that during DSB repair, non-homologous exogenous DNA (also termed 'filler DNA') can be incorporated at the site of a DSB. We have created a genetic system in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to study the mechanism of fragment capture. Our yeast strains carry recognition sites for the HO endonuclease at a unique chromosomal site, and plasmids in which a LEU2 gene is flanked by HO cut sites. Upon induction of the HO endonuclease, a linear extrachromosomal fragment is generated in each cell and its incorporation at the chromosomal DSB site can be genetically monitored. Our results show that linear fragments are captured at the repaired DSB site at frequencies of 10(-6) to 10(-4) per plated cell depending on strain background and specific end sequences. The mechanism of fragment capture depends on the NHEJ machinery, but only partially on the homologous recombination proteins. More than one fragment can be used during repair, by a mechanism that relies on the annealing of small complementary sequences. We present a model to explain the basis for fragment capture.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, FungalPlasmidsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, FungalHO protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSCEI protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID17670800
PMCPMC1976456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.