ArticleAtencion primaria2007
[Evaluation of the primary health care reform: preventive practices and inequalities].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social and health policies or interventions to tackle health inequalities in European cities: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2014Article
- Trends in social class inequalities in the use of health care services within the Spanish National Health System, 1993-2006.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2013Article
- [Regulation of smoking reduces the prevalence of smokers and tobacco consumption].Atencion primaria · 2010Article
- Social determinants of prescribed and non-prescribed medicine use.International journal for equity in health · 2010Article
- [Quitting and prevalence of smoking: gender, social class, and primary health care].Atencion primaria · 2008Article
- [Commentary: evaluation of primary care reform].Atencion primaria · 2007Article
- [Evolution of Smoking According to Social Class in the Adult Population of the Canary Islands During 2000-2015: Follow-up of the CDC-Canary Cohort].Atencion primariaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate primary care reform (PCR) in Barcelona during the year 2000 using 3 preventive practices: anti-smoking advice, blood pressure measurement, and flu vaccination. Any inequalities of gender, age, or social class in receiving these practices are also assessed.
designCross-sectional, descriptive, observational study.
settingBarcelona Health Survey, primary health care, Spain, year 2000.
participantsNon-institutionalised residents of the city of Barcelona over 15 years old in the year 2000 (N=10,000 people). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The indicators used were the prevalences of receiving the 3 practices. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.
resultsReceiving the preventive practices studied is greater in areas where PCR was established longer, compared to the centres that had not begun the reforms (63.7% as opposed to 53.2%, respectively). Anti-smoking advice, for women, is less frequent in the more disadvantaged classes (odds ratio [OR] =0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-1).
conclusionsPCR is a factor associated with carrying out preventive practices. No significant disparities between social class or gender were found for those who received the preventive practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.