ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2007
Predictive validity of an age-specific MET equation among youth of varying body size.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compliance with national guidelines for physical activity in U.S. preschoolers: measurement and interpretation.Pediatrics · 2011Article
- Evaluation of the effect of signalment and body conformation on activity monitoring in companion dogs.American journal of veterinary research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to cross-validate the age-specific Freedson MET equation among children and adolescents of varying body size. Sixty-seven children (41 boys; 26 girls) between 6 and 13 years completed five 3-min trials (1.6, 3.2, 4.0, 4.8, and 6.4 km h(-1)) on a motorized treadmill. During each trial, participants wore an Actigraph accelerometer while oxygen consumption was assessed by indirect calorimetry. Using the Actigraph activity counts, predicted MET values were determined with the age-specific Freedson equation and were compared with measured MET values using dependent t tests. Participants were divided into body size categories based on their calculated body surface area (BSA, m2) (small: BSA<or=0.96 m2; medium: 0.96 m2<BSA<or=1.20 m2; large: BSA>1.20 m2) to determine if body size influenced the difference between measured and predicted MET values. The measured MET value was similar to the predicted MET value at the slowest treadmill speed (1.6 km h(-1)) (2.3 vs. 2.3 METs); however, the measured MET value was lower than the predicted MET value at the remaining speeds (3.2, 4.0, 4.8, and 6.4 km h(-1)) (P<0.001). With the exception of the fastest treadmill speed (6.4 km h(-1)), the mean difference between the measured and predicted MET values was greater between the two smaller BSA categories compared to the largest BSA category. The results suggest that the age-specific Freedson child equation significantly overestimates energy expenditure (METs) during locomotor speeds between 3.2 and 6.4 km h(-1). This effect was primary observed among relatively smaller children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17668228What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.